Reputation: 32162
I have the beginnings of a calculus toolbox in f#. It's as much about learning f# as having something useful at the end to use in some other projects I have in mind. The basic and incomplete code is
namespace BradGoneSurfing.Symbolics
open Microsoft.FSharp.Quotations
open Microsoft.FSharp.Quotations.Patterns
open Microsoft.FSharp.Quotations.DerivedPatterns
open System
open Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection
open Microsoft.FSharp.Quotations
open FSharpx.Linq.QuotationEvaluation
open Microsoft.FSharp.Linq.RuntimeHelpers
module Calculus =
let rec der_impl param quotation =
let (|X|_|) input = if input = param then Some(X) else None
match quotation with
| SpecificCall <@ (*) @> (_,types,l::r::[]) ->
let dl = der_impl param l
let dr = der_impl param r
<@@ (%%dl:double) * (%%r:double) + (%%l:double) * (%%dr:double) @@>
| SpecificCall <@ Math.Sin @> (_,_types, arg::_) ->
let di = der_impl param arg
<@@ Math.Cos( (%%arg:double) ) @@>
| ExprShape.ShapeVar v ->
match v with
| X -> <@@ 1.0 @@>
| _ -> (Expr.Var v)
| ExprShape.ShapeLambda (v,expr) -> Expr.Lambda (v,der_impl param expr)
| ExprShape.ShapeCombination (o, exprs) -> ExprShape.RebuildShapeCombination (o,List.map (fun e -> der_impl param e ) exprs)
let rec der expr =
match expr with
| Lambda(param, body) ->
Expr.Lambda(param, (der_impl param body))
| _ -> failwith "oops"
and I have an NUnit / FSUnit test proving my first bits of code
namespace BradGoneSurfing.Symbolics.Test
open FsUnit
open NUnit.Framework
open Microsoft.FSharp.Quotations
open BradGoneSurfing.Symbolics.Calculus
open FSharpx.Linq.QuotationEvaluation
open System
open Microsoft.FSharp.Linq.RuntimeHelpers
[<TestFixture>]
type ``This is a test for symbolic derivatives`` ()=
[<Test>]
member x.``Derivative should work`` ()=
let e = <@ (fun (y:double) -> y * y) @>
let d = der e
let x = <@ fun (y:double) -> 1.0 * y + y * 1.0 @>
d |> should equal x
The test sort of works but doesn't. The result says
Expected:
Lambda (y,
Call (None, op_Addition,
[Call (None, op_Multiply, [Value (1.0), y]),
Call (None, op_Multiply, [y, Value (1.0)])]))
But Was:
Lambda (y,
Call (None, op_Addition,
[Call (None, op_Multiply, [Value (1.0), y]),
Call (None, op_Multiply, [y, Value (1.0)])]))
Now to my eye these two are identical but its seems not. I'm guessing I've made some sort of mix up with Expr vs Expr<'t> but I'm not sure. Some of the implementation code was trial and error to get it compiling.
Any ideas what the subtle error might be here?
Update With Solution
@Jack was correct that Var implements reference equality and makes it difficult to use standard equality checks with code quotations. For testing purposes it is ''correct enough`` to compare strings. To make this palatable I created a custom matcher for FsUnit/NUnit as below
type EqualsAsString (e:obj)=
inherit NUnit.Framework.Constraints.Constraint()
let expected = e
override x.Matches(actual:obj)=
x.actual <- actual
x.actual.ToString() = expected.ToString()
override x.WriteDescriptionTo(writer)=
writer.WriteExpectedValue(expected)
override x.WriteActualValueTo(writer)=
writer.WriteActualValue(x.actual)
and an FSUnit wrapper
let equalExpr (x:Expr<'t>) = new EqualsAsString(x)
so I can do
d |> should equalExpr <@ fun y -> y * y @>
and it will work as expected.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 325
Reputation: 11525
The Var
type used with F# quotations doesn't support structural equality. In fact, it doesn't implement IEquatable<'T>
either -- it only provides an override of the Equals
method which checks for reference equality:
https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp/blob/master/src/fsharp/FSharp.Core/quotations.fs#L122
So, it looks like the reason your test is failing is because the y
variables in your quotations aren't recognized as 'equal'. The first solution that comes to mind would be to create a custom implementation of IEqualityComparer<'T>
which does handle the variable equality in the way you want, then use it to check the expected value against the generated value.
Upvotes: 5