Reputation: 4862
I have a interface that is binded to a class. Everything work like excepted. I want to create the class with a constructor injection without passing my kernel everywhere. I want to have a singleton factory for these propose. How can i create one without using the ninject.extensions.factory library.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 798
Reputation: 3562
If you want to create a factory but without using the Factory Extension (not sure why, it's exactly what you need here I think) you can do something like the following:
public class FooFactory : IFooFactory
{
// allows us to Get things from the kernel, but not add new bindings etc.
private readonly IResolutionRoot resolutionRoot;
public FooFactory(IResolutionRoot resolutionRoot)
{
this.resolutionRoot = resolutionRoot;
}
public IFoo CreateFoo()
{
return this.resolutionRoot.Get<IFoo>();
}
// or if you want to specify a value at runtime...
public IFoo CreateFoo(string myArg)
{
return this.resolutionRoot.Get<IFoo>(new ConstructorArgument("myArg", myArg));
}
}
public class Foo : IFoo { ... }
public class NeedsFooAtRuntime
{
public NeedsFooAtRuntime(IFooFactory factory)
{
this.foo = factory.CreateFoo("test");
}
}
Bind<IFooFactory>().To<FooFactory>();
Bind<IFoo>().To<Foo>();
The Factory Extension just does all of that work for you at runtime though. You only need to define the factory interface and the extension creates the implementation dynamically.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3075
Try this code:
class NinjectKernelSingleton
{
private static YourKernel _kernel;
public static YourKernel Kernel
{
get { return _kernel ?? (_kernel = new YourKernel()); }
}
}
public class YourKernel
{
private IKernel _kernel;
public YourKernel()
{
_kernel = InitKernel();
}
private IKernel InitKernel()
{
//Ninject init logic goes here
}
public T Resolve<T>()
{
return _kernel.Get<T>();
}
}
Upvotes: 0