Reputation: 319
I know it is a very commonly faced problem. But, there is a slight difference, my WPF installs perfectly and runs on Windows 7 and Windows 8 OSes. But, when tried to install on a VM running Windows XP, it gives the following Error:
Cannot continue. The application is improperly formatted. Details:
PLATFORM VERSION INFO
Windows : 5.1.2600.196608 (Win32NT)
Common Language Runtime : 4.0.30319.1
System.Deployment.dll : 4.0.30319.1 (RTMRel.030319-0100)
clr.dll : 4.0.30319.1 (RTMRel.030319-0100)
dfdll.dll : 4.0.30319.1 (RTMRel.030319-0100)
dfshim.dll : 4.0.31106.0 (Main.031106-0000)
SOURCES
Deployment url : file:///S:/K3FrontEnd_NET4/Karacell3.application
ERROR SUMMARY
Below is a summary of the errors, details of these errors are listed later in the log.
* Activation of S:\K3FrontEnd_NET4\Karacell3.application resulted in exception. Following failure messages were detected:
+ Exception reading manifest from file:///S:/K3FrontEnd_NET4/Karacell3.application: the manifest may not be valid or the file could not be opened.
+ Manifest XML signature is not valid.
+ SignatureDescription could not be created for the signature algorithm supplied.
COMPONENT STORE TRANSACTION FAILURE SUMMARY
No transaction error was detected.
WARNINGS
There were no warnings during this operation.
OPERATION PROGRESS STATUS
* [4/3/2013 2:58:13 PM] : Activation of S:\K3FrontEnd_NET4\Karacell3.application has started.
ERROR DETAILS
Following errors were detected during this operation.
* [4/3/2013 2:58:14 PM] System.Deployment.Application.InvalidDeploymentException (ManifestParse)
- Exception reading manifest from file:///S:/K3FrontEnd_NET4/Karacell3.application: the manifest may not be valid or the file could not be opened.
- Source: System.Deployment
- Stack trace:
at System.Deployment.Application.ManifestReader.FromDocument(String localPath, ManifestType manifestType, Uri sourceUri)
at System.Deployment.Application.DownloadManager.DownloadDeploymentManifestDirectBypass(SubscriptionStore subStore, Uri& sourceUri, TempFile& tempFile, SubscriptionState& subState, IDownloadNotification notification, DownloadOptions options, ServerInformation& serverInformation)
at System.Deployment.Application.DownloadManager.DownloadDeploymentManifestBypass(SubscriptionStore subStore, Uri& sourceUri, TempFile& tempFile, SubscriptionState& subState, IDownloadNotification notification, DownloadOptions options)
at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.PerformDeploymentActivation(Uri activationUri, Boolean isShortcut, String textualSubId, String deploymentProviderUrlFromExtension, BrowserSettings browserSettings, String& errorPageUrl)
at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.ActivateDeploymentWorker(Object state)
--- Inner Exception ---
System.Deployment.Application.InvalidDeploymentException (SignatureValidation)
- Manifest XML signature is not valid.
- Source: System.Deployment
- Stack trace:
at System.Deployment.Application.Manifest.AssemblyManifest.ValidateSignature(Stream s)
at System.Deployment.Application.ManifestReader.FromDocument(String localPath, ManifestType manifestType, Uri sourceUri)
--- Inner Exception ---
System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException
- SignatureDescription could not be created for the signature algorithm supplied.
- Source: System.Security
- Stack trace:
at System.Security.Cryptography.Xml.SignedXml.CheckSignedInfo(AsymmetricAlgorithm key)
at System.Security.Cryptography.Xml.SignedXml.CheckSignature(AsymmetricAlgorithm key)
at System.Security.Cryptography.Xml.SignedXml.CheckSignatureReturningKey(AsymmetricAlgorithm& signingKey)
at System.Deployment.Internal.CodeSigning.SignedCmiManifest.Verify(CmiManifestVerifyFlags verifyFlags)
at System.Deployment.Application.Manifest.AssemblyManifest.ValidateSignature(Stream s)
COMPONENT STORE TRANSACTION DETAILS
No transaction information is available.
Please help me enumerate possible cause of this error.
Upvotes: 9
Views: 35188
Reputation: 111
Commenting out the vista entry in app.manifest worked for me
<application>
<!-- A list of all Windows versions that this application is designed to work with.
Windows will automatically select the most compatible environment.-->
<!-- If your application is designed to work with Windows Vista, uncomment the following supportedOS node-->
<!--<supportedOS Id="{e2011457-1546-43c5-a5fe-008deee3d3f0}"></supportedOS>-->
<!-- If your application is designed to work with Windows 7, uncomment the following supportedOS node-->
<supportedOS Id="{35138b9a-5d96-4fbd-8e2d-a2440225f93a}"/>
<!-- If your application is designed to work with Windows 8, uncomment the following supportedOS node-->
<supportedOS Id="{4a2f28e3-53b9-4441-ba9c-d69d4a4a6e38}"></supportedOS>
<!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 8.1 -->
<supportedOS Id="{1f676c76-80e1-4239-95bb-83d0f6d0da78}"/>
<!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 10 -->
<supportedOS Id="{8e0f7a12-bfb3-4fe8-b9a5-48fd50a15a9a}"/>
</application>
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 779
I had similar issue, almost the same. I solved an issue by removing .dll that are not in root of application files.
Visual studio 2019: Right click on project name - Properties - Publish - Application files.
Like in this article: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/3d0c4382-9b48-4d28-9b79-25607e668074/problem-with-installing-clickonce-after-adding-reportviewercontrol-14-to-the-project?forum=winformssetup
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 507
I found the reason. It was MIME type issue in server setting.
So, please add .htaccess
file in FTP root directory.
And write this in it.
AddType application/microsoftpatch .msp
AddType application/microsoftupdate .msu
AddType application/x-ms-application .application
AddType application/x-ms-application .manifest
AddType application/octet stream .deploy
AddType application/x-ms-vsto .vsto
It works perfectly for me.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 226
I was able to solve my issue by removing the signing of the manifest.
If you right-click your project and go to properties then to the Signing Tab; uncheck the Sign the ClickOnce manifests and Sign the assembly.
I'm not sure what this does in terms of security but my app installed after I removed these options.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1
It's because your developer machine had .NET 4.5 installed, while your client machines only had .NET 4.0 installed. The .NET 4.0 client machines can't read the manifest, as they expect SHA-1, while the .NET 4.5 developer machines can.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 37
I had the same issue for a WinForms app that was built with Visual Studio 2012 and deployed on an XP machine with all the critical updates (SP3 installed and Windows Installer 4.5). I too had to change my application to be unsigned by going to the [Signing] tab on the Properties page of my project. I unchecked both: [Sign the Click One manifests] and [Sign the assembly]. The same application installed fine on Windows 7 machines with the signing enabled.
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 2078
I had the same issue and it was just the machine didn't have the appropriate .Net version.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 11877
Do you have SP-3 installed on the windows XP machine, and all of the available Windows Updates? Microsoft pushes out updates to the code around certificates, and the trusted publishers and other related info periodically.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 49984
I have seen a similar issue before where a particular WIndows OS could not 'understand' or validate the results of a certificate hash due to missing crypto providers, in my particular case it was related to using a X509 certificate generated using a v3 template for the clickonce signing.
SignatureDescription could not be created for the signature algorithm supplied
The highlighted part of the message combined with the successful installation on several machines before failing on the WinXP machine would indicate that you are also running into a similar problem - WinXP doesn't know about the crypto algorithmn specified in the certificate that you've used to sign the clickonce.
I don't know of a good solution to this, normal advice you will find on the internet is to use a v2 template to generate the X509 instead of a v3 template, but this is not necessarily a good solution and is beyond the capabilities of most organisations (espcecially as most people use a bought certificate rather than certs generated from their own Certificate Authority).
Upvotes: 0