Reputation: 76909
I'm taking a look at Go
, and was trying to find idiomatic implementations of classic algorithms to get a feel for the language.
I chose quicksort because I'm particularly interested in the arrays vs slices, in-place vs copy deal. After I settle some concepts down, I want to write a parallel impl.
Can someone please show me an idiomatic implementation of quicksort in Go
?
Upvotes: 11
Views: 14193
Reputation: 459
Here's a solution I built following the Python examples in the book Grokking algorithms. It felt a little less mind bending, so I thought I'd share.
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
list := []int{33, 10, 15, 45, 65, 16, 5}
fmt.Println(quicksort(list))
}
func quicksort(list []int) []int {
if len(list) < 2 {
return list
}
if len(list) == 2 {
left, right := 0, len(list)-1
if list[0] > list[1] {
list[left], list[right] = list[right], list[left]
}
return list
}
pivot := list[0]
var less []int
var greater []int
for i := range list {
if list[i] < pivot {
less = append(less, list[i])
}
if list[i] > pivot {
greater = append(greater, list[i])
}
}
return append(append(quicksort(less), pivot), quicksort(greater)...)
}
You can run it on the Go Playground here.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1
func QuickSortArr(arr []int) {
var i int
var j int
var hi int
var hSave bool
aLen := len(arr)
helpArr := make([]int, aLen)
hSave = true
var tmpHelp []int
var tmpArr []int
for m := 1; m < aLen; m += m {
i = 0
j = 0 + m
hi = 0
if hSave {
tmpHelp = helpArr
tmpArr = arr
} else {
tmpHelp = arr
tmpArr = helpArr
}
for i < aLen && j < aLen {
i2 := i + m
j2 := j + m
for i < i2 && i < aLen && j < j2 && j < aLen {
if tmpArr[i] > tmpArr[j] {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[j]
hi++
j++
} else {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[i]
hi++
i++
}
}
for i < i2 && i < aLen {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[i]
hi++
i++
}
for j < j2 && j < aLen {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[j]
hi++
j++
}
i += m
j += m
}
for i < aLen {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[i]
hi++
i++
}
for j < aLen {
tmpHelp[hi] = tmpArr[j]
hi++
j++
}
hSave = !hSave
}
if !hSave {
copy(arr, helpArr)
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1677
For Go 1.18 and above, using generics:
import (
"golang.org/x/exp/constraints"
)
func QuickSort[T constraints.Ordered](a []T) {
if len(a) > 1 {
quickSort(a, 0, len(a)-1)
}
}
func quickSort[T constraints.Ordered](a []T, lo, hi int) {
if lo < hi {
p := partition(a, lo, hi)
quickSort(a, lo, p-1)
quickSort(a, p+1, hi)
}
}
func partition[T constraints.Ordered](a []T, lo, hi int) int {
l, p := lo, findPivot(a, lo, hi)
for r := lo; r < hi; r++ {
if a[r] < a[p] {
a[l], a[r] = a[r], a[l]
l++
}
}
a[l], a[p] = a[p], a[l]
return l
}
// median of three technique
func findPivot[T constraints.Ordered](a []T, lo, hi int) int {
mi := (lo + hi) / 2
if a[lo] > a[mi] {
a[lo], a[mi] = a[mi], a[lo]
}
if a[lo] > a[hi] {
a[lo], a[hi] = a[hi], a[lo]
}
if a[mi] > a[hi] {
a[mi], a[hi] = a[hi], a[mi]
}
a[mi], a[hi-1] = a[hi-1], a[mi]
return hi - 1
}
Usage:
a := []int{1, 8, 4, 9, 6, 3, 5, 2, 7, 0}
fmt.Println(a, "(original)")
QuickSort(a)
fmt.Println(a, "(sorted)")
b := []string{"tuv", "abc", "jkl", "ghi", "mno", "wxyz", "def", "pqrs"}
fmt.Println(b, "(original)")
QuickSort(b)
fmt.Println(b, "(sorted)")
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1081
Could use some thoughts on this.
func quickSort(arr []int) []int {
sort(arr, 0, len(arr) - 1)
return arr
}
func sort(arr []int, low, high int) {
if low < high {
pi := partition(arr, low, high)
sort(arr, low, pi-1)
sort(arr, pi+1, high)
}
}
func partition(arr []int, low, high int) int {
pivot := arr[high]
i := low-1
for j := low; j < high; j++ {
if arr[j] <= pivot {
i++
arr[i], arr[j] = arr[j], arr[i]
}
}
arr[i+1], arr[high] = arr[high], arr[i+1]
return i+1
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4849
I'm just learning go right now and decided to implement qsort as a simple task, using channels and parallelism since in qsort you can sort both halves concurrently after pivoting the array. I ended up with smth like that:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
)
func qsort_pass(arr []int, done chan int) []int{
if len(arr) < 2 {
done <- len(arr)
return arr
}
pivot := arr[0]
i, j := 1, len(arr)-1
for i != j {
for arr[i] < pivot && i!=j{
i++
}
for arr[j] >= pivot && i!=j{
j--
}
if arr[i] > arr[j] {
arr[i], arr[j] = arr[j], arr[i]
}
}
if arr[j] >= pivot {
j--
}
arr[0], arr[j] = arr[j], arr[0]
done <- 1;
go qsort_pass(arr[:j], done)
go qsort_pass(arr[j+1:], done)
return arr
}
func qsort(arr []int) []int {
done := make(chan int)
defer func() {
close(done)
}()
go qsort_pass(arr[:], done)
rslt := len(arr)
for rslt > 0 {
rslt -= <-done;
}
return arr
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("About to sort.")
rand.Seed(time.Now().UTC().UnixNano())
arr_rand := make([]int, 20)
for i := range arr_rand {
arr_rand[i] = rand.Intn(10)
}
fmt.Println(arr_rand)
qsort(arr_rand)
fmt.Println(arr_rand)
}
There's plenty of room for improvement here like using a pool of go-routines instead of spawning a new go-routine for each partition, and sorting with insertion sort if len(arr) is small enough or using something other than []int. But generally it looks like a good place to start.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 76909
Well, I ended up with this. I don't know enough Go
to say it's idiomatic, but I used slices, one-line swaps and a range
clause. It's been pretty informative for me to write, so I thought I should share.
func qsort(a []int) []int {
if len(a) < 2 { return a }
left, right := 0, len(a) - 1
// Pick a pivot
pivotIndex := rand.Int() % len(a)
// Move the pivot to the right
a[pivotIndex], a[right] = a[right], a[pivotIndex]
// Pile elements smaller than the pivot on the left
for i := range a {
if a[i] < a[right] {
a[i], a[left] = a[left], a[i]
left++
}
}
// Place the pivot after the last smaller element
a[left], a[right] = a[right], a[left]
// Go down the rabbit hole
qsort(a[:left])
qsort(a[left + 1:])
return a
}
Upvotes: 39
Reputation: 166569
Simply taking code from one language, for example C, and simplistically converting it to another language, for example Go, rarely produces idiomatic code.
Go sort package -- sort.c source file
func quickSort(data Interface, a, b, maxDepth int) { // . . . // Avoiding recursion on the larger subproblem guarantees // a stack depth of at most lg(b-a). // . . . }
This comment is a clue that implementing a recursive solution may not be the best strategy. Go uses short stacks.
Here's an iterative Quicksort solution.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
)
type Item int
type Items []Item
// Algorithms and Data Structures, N. Wirth
// http://www.ethoberon.ethz.ch/WirthPubl/AD.pdf
// 2.3.3 Partition Sort, Quicksort, NonRecursiveQuickSort.
func qSort(a Items) {
const M = 12
var i, j, l, r int
var x Item
var low, high = make([]int, 0, M), make([]int, 0, M)
low, high = append(low, 0), append(high, len(a)-1)
for { // (*take top request from stack*)
l, low = low[len(low)-1], low[:len(low)-1]
r, high = high[len(high)-1], high[:len(high)-1]
for { // (*partition a[l] ... a[r]*)
i, j = l, r
x = a[l+(r-l)/2]
for {
for ; a[i] < x; i++ {
}
for ; x < a[j]; j-- {
}
if i <= j {
a[i], a[j] = a[j], a[i]
i++
j--
}
if i > j {
break
}
}
if i < r { // (*stack request to sort right partition*)
low, high = append(low, i), append(high, r)
}
r = j // (*now l and r delimit the left partition*)
if l >= r {
break
}
}
if len(low)+len(high) == 0 {
break
}
}
}
func main() {
nItems := 4096
a := make(Items, nItems)
rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
for i := range a {
a[i] = Item(rand.Int31())
}
qSort(a)
for i := range a[1:] {
if a[i] > a[i+1] {
fmt.Println("(* sort error *)")
}
}
}
Clearly, there is more to be done. For example, improving the partitioning algorithm and changing the qsort
function signature to use a Go interface
type.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1356
Take a look at the source of the sort package from the standard library, particularily sort.Sort.
Upvotes: 4