Reputation: 9526
Another instance of the NoSuchMethodError
for the JUnit & Hamcrest combination.
Offending code:
assertThat(dirReader.document(0).getFields(), hasItem(
new FeatureMatcher<IndexableField, String>(equalTo("Patisnummer"), "Field key", "Field key") {
@Override
protected String featureValueOf(IndexableField actual) {
return actual.name();
} } ));
Commented lines 152–157 in IndexerTest.java (commit ac72ce)
Causes a NoSuchMethodError (see http://db.tt/qkkkTE78 for complete output):
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.hamcrest.Matcher.describeMismatch(Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/hamcrest/Description;)V
at org.hamcrest.FeatureMatcher.matchesSafely(FeatureMatcher.java:43)
at org.hamcrest.TypeSafeDiagnosingMatcher.matches(TypeSafeDiagnosingMatcher.java:55)
at org.hamcrest.core.IsCollectionContaining.matchesSafely(IsCollectionContaining.java:25)
at org.hamcrest.core.IsCollectionContaining.matchesSafely(IsCollectionContaining.java:14)
at org.hamcrest.TypeSafeDiagnosingMatcher.matches(TypeSafeDiagnosingMatcher.java:55)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:770)
at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:736)
at indexer.IndexerTest.testIndexContainsField(IndexerTest.java:152)
A NoSuchMethodError
is caused by (compiled) classes that call non existing methods. The specific case of describeMismatch
and the JUnit + Hamcrest combination is often caused by an incompatibility between Hamcrest classes included in JUnit and versions of those classes in the Hamcrest library.
The pom contains an explicit dependency on Hamcrest-library 1.3, Hamcrest-core 1.3, and JUnit 4.11, (in that order) as suggested by Garrett Hall in answer to Getting "NoSuchMethodError: org.hamcrest.Matcher.describeMismatch" when running test in IntelliJ 10.5
According to the JUnit documentation the JUnit 4.11 Maven dependency does no longer include compiled Hamcrest classes, instead it has a dependency on Hamcrest-core 1.3; so the NoSuchMethodError
should not occur.
Checking the dependency tree with mvn dependency:tree
as suggested by Dan in answer to junit and hamcrest declaration shows the explicit dependencies on Hamcrest 1.3 and JUnit 4.11 and no other dependencies to those files (see http://db.tt/C2OfTDJB for the complete output).
In another test the NoSuchMethodError
was avoided by using:
assertThat(
"Zylab detector not available",
d.getDetectors(),
hasItem(Matchers.<Detector>instanceOf(ZylabMetadataXmlDetector.class)));
In lines 120–123 of IndexerTest.java (commit ac72ce) instead of the more obvious:
assertThat(
"Zylab detector not available",
d.getDetectors(),
hasItem(isA(ZylabMetadataDetector.class));
I'm uncertain whether the explicit type parameter <Detector>
, using instanceOf
instead of isA
, the explicit reference to Hamcrest's Matchers
, or a combination of those avoided the NoSuchMethodException
; after fiddling around and trying different things it worked.
Using explicit type parameters did not solve/avoid the error.
Using a class derived from BaseMatcher
instead of FeatureMatcher
did not solve/avoid the error.
NoSuchMethodError
?Upvotes: 43
Views: 30212
Reputation: 29276
For a project with Gradle
as a build tool:
testCompile("junit:junit:4.11") {
exclude group: 'org.hamcrest', module: 'hamcrest-core'
exclude group: 'org.hamcrest', module: 'hamcrest-library'
}
testCompile group: 'org.hamcrest', name: 'hamcrest-core', version: '1.3'
testCompile group: 'org.hamcrest', name: 'hamcrest-library', version: '1.3'
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 4575
I solved this jar hell
problem in my Gradle
project with the code below:
testCompile (group: 'junit', name: 'junit', version: '4+') {
exclude group: 'org.hamcrest'
}
testCompile ('org.mockito:mockito-core:1+') {
exclude group: 'org.hamcrest'
}
testCompile 'org.hamcrest:java-hamcrest:2.0.0.0'
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 9526
Using David's tip and How do I split a string on a delimiter in Bash? resulted in the following bash script:
( IFS=":"; for i in `mvn dependency:build-classpath | grep -v '\[INFO\]'`; do jar tf $i | awk "{print \"$i\\t\" \$1}"; done | grep Matcher )
(online at http://www.kaspervandenberg.net/2013/scripts/findDependencyClass.sh)
Which found that dependency JGlobus-Core-2.0.4
has its own versions of org.hamcrest.BaseMatcher
, org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers
, and org.hamcrest.Matcher
.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 53
If you are using Eclipse: For me, in eclipse-> project properties->Java build Path moving mockito-all-1.9.5.jar to the bottom of the 'Order and Export' list did the trick. Just above that I have junit-4.11.jar and above that hamcrest-core-1.3.jar
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 21
What worked for me was to reorder dependencies. Instead of going mockito, junit, I had to put junit, mockito.
Mockito 1.9.5 uses hamcrest 1.1 which is incompatible and causes problems.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 286
This blog helped fix the same problem for me:
Inside the dependencies for Mockito and Junit, the author added excludes:
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.11</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<artifactId>hamcrest-core</artifactId>
<groupId>org.hamcrest</groupId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Upvotes: 27
Reputation: 4927
If you are using Eclipse, the "Open Type" tool (CTRL+SHIFT+T) can help you find the problematic package. Just search for the class name (e.g., Description), multiple occurrences of the same class from different JARs are red flags.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 36542
Perhaps one of those other JARs has older versions of Hamcrest's Matcher
or BaseMatcher
. Here's a list of JARs which include the latter, though I have no idea how comprehensive that site is. Is there a Maven plugin which will show you all the dependencies that include a class similar to the dependency tree?
Upvotes: 2