CODEWITHSUNDEEP
rubyoperatorsmetaprogrammingmonkeypatching
Geo
Geo

Reputation: 96807

Can Ruby operators be aliased?

I'm interested in how one would go in getting this to work :

me = "this is a string"
class << me
  alias :old<< :<<
  def <<(text)
    old<<(text)
    puts "appended #{text}"
  end
end

I'd like that when something gets appended to the me variable, the object will use the redefined method.

If I try to run this, I get syntax error, unexpected ':', expecting kEND at :<<.

Upvotes: 1

Views: 790

Answers (5)

frogstarr78
frogstarr78

Reputation: 868

While I agree with thenduks and ephemient, You can alias the operator that way then use send to call it, you can also still use class inheritance. e.g.:

me = "is a string"

class << me
  def <<(text)
    super
    puts "appended #{text}"
  end
end

me << " bob"
puts me #=> is a string appended bob

Upvotes: 0

J&#246;rg W Mittag
J&#246;rg W Mittag

Reputation: 369458

As others have already explained, the problem is simply that old<< is not a legal Ruby identifier. You can, with tricks, create a method with that name, but you can't call it in the normal ways, and it certainly won't be recognized as an operator.

However, all the answers so far, while they have certainly answered your question, have completely ignored the underlying problem: that method shouldn't even have a name in the first place! And if it doesn't have a name, then the problem of the name being illegal simply doesn't even arise.

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'test/unit'
require 'stringio'
class TestOperatorDecorator < Test::Unit::TestCase
  def setup; @old_stdout, $> = $>, (@fake_stdout = StringIO.new) end
  def teardown; $> = @old_stdout end

  def test_that_me_dot_append_writes_to_stdio
    me = 'this is a string'
    class << me
      old_method = instance_method :<<

      define_method :<< do |text|
        old_method.bind(self).(text)
        puts "appended #{text}"
      end
    end

    me << 'Test'

    assert_equal "appended Test\n", @fake_stdout.string
  end
end

In this case, the method never gets named, which not only means that we don't have to invent a name for it, it also means that it doesn't pollute the namespace.

Upvotes: 2

rfunduk
rfunduk

Reputation: 30442

Only certain characters are allowed in symbol literals. You are looking for:

alias :"old<<" :"<<"

Upvotes: 7

newacct
newacct

Reputation: 122439

The problem is with :old<<. It gets interpreted as :old <<, i.e. a symbol :old followed by the << operator, so it is a syntax error. Maybe you can try :"old<<"?

Upvotes: 1

ephemient
ephemient

Reputation: 204718

:old<< looks like ":old <<". Try just :old, or if you really want, :"old<<" (but have fun calling it through that name).

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions