Reputation: 9234
I have Samsung Galaxy S3, which used its own Exynos 4 Quad processor. So I want to optimize my app, that it can use all 4 cores of processor.
So I made some tests:
Run task in one thread. Processing time - 8 seconds.
Run task in four threads. Processing time - still 8 sec.
new Thread() {
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}
}.start();
new Thread() {
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}
}.start();
new Thread() {
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}
}.start();
new Thread() {
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}
}.start();
Run task in ExecutorService. And processing time - still 8 sec.
ExecutorService threadPool = null;
threadPool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);
threadPool.execute(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}});
threadPool.execute(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}});
threadPool.execute(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}});
threadPool.execute(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// do 1/4 of task
}});
Looks like all work done synchronously. Why its not paralleling ?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 2436
Reputation: 52323
You can try my tests, in C or Java:
http://bigflake.com/cpu-spinner.c.txt
http://bigflake.com/MultiCore.java.txt
When MultiCore.java is run on a Nexus 4, I see:
Thread 1 finished in 1516ms (1267234688)
Thread 3 finished in 1494ms (1519485328)
Thread 0 finished in 1530ms (51099776)
Thread 2 finished in 1543ms (-1106614992)
All threads finished in 1550ms
Update: It's useful to watch the test with systrace. As part of answering a similar question I set up a page that shows the systrace output for this test. You can see how the threads are scheduled, and watch the other two cores spin up.
Upvotes: 3