Kotlin Ternary Conditional Operator

Question

What is the equivalent of this expression in Kotlin?

a ? b : c

This is not valid code in Kotlin.

Answer 1

Some corner cases not mentioned in other answers.

Since appearance of takeIf in Kotlin 1.1 the ternary operator a ? b : c can also be expressed like this:

b.takeIf { a } ?: c

This becomes even shorter in case c is null:

b.takeIf { a }

A general workaround to make b lazily-evaluated:

true.takeIf { a }?.let { b } ?: c

---

Also note that typical in Java world null checks like value != null ? value : defaultValue translate in ideomatic Kotlin to just value ?: defaultValue.

Similarly, a != null ? b : c can be translated to a?.let { b } ?: c.

---

See is also Boolean?.ifTrue proposal in KT-6938 which should allow to streamline a ? b : null expressions to a.ifTrue { b } without prematurely evaluating the b.

Answer 2

if condition is false then "wrong", otherwise it's some string()

Let's consider the following prototype before writing a ternary conditional operator:

if (!answer.isSuccessful()) {
    result = "wrong"
} else {
    result = answer.body().string()
}
return result

---

Solutions

You can use ! (logical not) operator in Kotlin's if-expression:

return if (!answer.isSuccessful()) "wrong" else answer.body().string()

It can be much better if you flip if-expression (expression without ! operator):

return if (answer.isSuccessful()) answer.body().string() else "wrong"

---

Kotlin’s Elvis operator ?: can do a job even better:

return answer.body()?.string() ?: "wrong"

---

Also, use an Extension function for the corresponding Answer class:

fun Answer.bodyOrNull(): Body? = if (isSuccessful()) body() else null

---

In the Extension function you can reduce a code thanks to Elvis operator:

return answer.bodyOrNull()?.string() ?: "wrong"

---

Or just use when conditional expression:

when (!answer.isSuccessful()) {
    parseInt(str) -> result = "wrong"
    else -> result = answer.body().string()
}

Answer 3

We can use ifEmpty function also just like below.

 val userName="anystring"
 textview.text = userName.ifEmpty { "otherstring" }

Answer 4

as Drew Noakes quoted, kotlin use if statement as expression, so Ternary Conditional Operator is not necessary anymore,

but with the extension function and infix overloading, you could implement that yourself, here is an example

infix fun <T> Boolean.then(value: T?) = TernaryExpression(this, value)

class TernaryExpression<out T>(val flag: Boolean, val truly: T?) {
    infix fun <T> or(falsy: T?) = if (flag) truly else falsy
}

then use it like this

val grade = 90
val clazz = (grade > 80) then "A" or "B"

Answer 5

You can use the if expression for this in Kotlin. In Kotlin if is an expression with a result value. So in Kotlin, we can write

fun max(a: Int, b: Int) = if (a > b) a else b

and in Java, we can achieve the same but with larger code

int max(int a, int b) {
return a > b ? a : b
}

Answer 6

There is no ternary operator in kotlin, as the if else block returns the value.

so, you can do: val max = if (a > b) a else b instead of java's max = (a > b) ? b : c

We can also use when construction, it also returns value:

val max = when(a > b) {
    true -> a
    false -> b
}

Here is the link for kotlin documentation : Control Flow: if, when, for, while

Answer 7

You can use var a= if (a) b else c in place of the ternary operator.

Another good concept of kotlin is the Elvis operator. You don't need to check null every time.

val l = b?.length ?: -1

This will return length if b is not null otherwise it executes the right side statement.

Answer 8

You can do something like this:

val ans = (exp1 == exp2) then "yes" ?: "no"

by using this extension:

infix fun<T> Boolean.then(first: T): T? = if (this) first else null

P.S: Don't modify the above infix function to accept first: T?, the expression will become logically incorrect. Eg: If you modify it to accept nullable first: T?, then val ans = (true == true) then null ?: "abcd", ans will be "abcd", which would not be correct.

Answer 9

Other answers here with e.g. takeIf assume something like x = (a != null) ? a : c or x = (a != null) ? a.method() : c but this is not in fact equivalent to x = a ? b : c

To achieve a true equivalent of the ternary operator with null safety-check (i.e. x = (a != null) ? b : c) you can use let instead of takeIf, i.e.

val x = a?.let {b} ?: c

where b may or may not be a method that invokes something on a.

Answer 10

Another interesting approach would be to use when:

when(a) {
  true -> b
  false -> c
}

Can be quite handy in some more complex scenarios. And honestly, it's more readable for me than if ... else ...

Answer 11

Kotlin doesn't have a ternary operator. You can use the regular if expression as shown below:

if (condition) exp1 else exp2

Also in addition to the fact that if in Kotlin is not a statement but an expression (i.e. it evaluates to a value), in the case where you have multiple statements inside the body of an if branch (or the body of else or else if), the last line of the block is the value of that branch. For example:

if (a>b) {
    println("a is greater than b")
    a // value of this if
} else {
    println("b is greater than a")
    b // value of else
}

Answer 12

TL;DR

if (a) b else c

^ is what you can use instead of the ternary operator expression a ? b : c which Kotlin syntax does not allow.

---

In Kotlin, many control statements, such as if, when, and even try, can be used as expressions. As a result, these statements can have a result which may be assigned to a variable, be returned from a function, etc.

Syntactically, there's no need for ternary operator

As a result of Kotlin's expressions, the language does not really need the ternary operator.

if (a) b else c

is what you can use instead of the ternary operator expression a ? b : c.

I think the idea is that the former expression is more readable since everybody knows what ifelse does, whereas ? : is rather unclear if you're not familiar with the syntax already.

Nevertheless, I have to admit that I often miss the more convenient ternary operator.

---

Other Alternatives

when

You might also see when constructs used in Kotlin when conditions are checked. It's also a way to express if-else cascades in an alternative way. The following corresponds to the OTs example.

when(a) {
    true -> b
    false -> c
}

Extensions

As many good examples (Kotlin Ternary Conditional Operator) in the other answers show, extensions can also help with solving your use case.

Answer 13

fun max(x:Int,y:Int) : String = if (x>y) "max = $x" else "max = $y"

inline funcation

Answer 14

In Kotlin you can use ternary operation like this: val x = if(a) "add b" else "add c"

Answer 15

Java's equivalent of ternary operator

a ? b : c

is a simple IF in Kotlin in one line

if(a) b else c

there is no ternary operator (condition ? then : else), because ordinary if works fine in this role.

https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/control-flow.html#if-expression

---

Special case for Null comparison

you can use the Elvis operator

if ( a != null ) a else b
// equivalent to
a ?: b

Answer 16

If you do not what to use the standard notation you can also create/simulate it using infix with something like this:

create a class to hold your target and result:

data class Ternary<T>(val target: T, val result: Boolean)

create some infix functions to simulate a ternary operation

infix fun <T> Boolean.then(target: T): Ternary<T> {
    return Ternary(target, this)
}

infix fun <T> Ternary<T>.or(target: T): T {
    return if (this.result) this.target else target
}

Then you will be able to use it like this:

val collection: List<Int> = mutableListOf(1, 2, 3, 4)

var exampleOne = collection.isEmpty() then "yes" or "no"
var exampleTwo = (collection.isNotEmpty() && collection.contains(2)) then "yes" or "no"
var exampleThree = collection.contains(1) then "yes" or "no"

Answer 17

Remember Ternary operator and Elvis operator hold separate meanings in Kotlin unlike in many popular languages. Doing expression? value1: value2 would give you bad words by the Kotlin compiler, unlike any other language as there is no ternary operator in Kotlin as mentioned in the official docs. The reason is that the if, when and try-catch statements themselves return values.

So, doing expression? value1: value2 can be replaced by

val max = if (a > b) print("Choose a") else print("Choose b")

The Elvis operator that Kotlin has, works only in the case of nullable variables ex.:

If I do something like value3 = value1 ?: value2 then if value1 is null then value2 would be returned otherwise value1 would be returned.

A more clear understanding can be achieved from these answers.

Answer 18

When working with apply(), let seems very handy when dealing with ternary operations, as it is more elegant and give you room

val columns: List<String> = ...
val band = Band().apply {
    name = columns[0]
    album = columns[1]
    year = columns[2].takeIf { it.isNotEmpty() }?.let { it.toInt() } ?: 0
}

Answer 19

Why would one use something like this:

when(a) {
  true -> b
  false -> b
}

when you can actually use something like this (a is boolean in this case):

when {
  a -> b
  else -> b
}

Answer 20

example: var energy: Int = data?.get(position)?.energy?.toInt() ?: 0

In kotlin if you are using ?: it will work like if the statement will return null then ?: 0 it will take 0 or whatever you have write this side.

Answer 21

There is no ternary operator in Kotlin, the most closed are the below two cases,

• If else as expression statement

val a = true if(a) print("A is true") else print("A is false")

• Elvis operator

If the expression to the left of ?: is not null, the elvis operator returns it, otherwise it returns the expression to the right. Note that the right-hand side expression is evaluated only if the left-hand side is null.

 val name = node.getName() ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("name expected")

Reference docs

Answer 22

There is no ternary operation in Kotlin, but there are some fun ways to work around that. As others have pointed out, a direct translation into Kotlin would look like this:

val x = if (condition) result1 else result2

But, personally, I think that can get a bit cluttered and hard to read. There are some other options built into the library. You can use takeIf {} with an elvis operator:

val x = result1.takeIf { condition } ?: result2

What is happening there is that the takeIf { } command returns either your result1 or null, and the elvis operator handles the null option. There are some additional options, takeUnless { }, for example:

val x = result1.takeUnless { condition } ?: result2

The language is clear, you know what that's doing.

If it's a commonly used condition, you could also do something fun like use an inline extension method. Let's assume we want to track a game score as an Int, for example, and we want to always return 0 if a given condition is not met:

inline fun Int.zeroIfFalse(func: () -> Boolean) : Int = if (!func.invoke()) 0 else this     

Ok, that seems ugly. But consider how it looks when it is used:

var score = 0
val twoPointer = 2
val threePointer = 3

score += twoPointer.zeroIfFalse { scoreCondition } 
score += threePointer.zeroIfFalse { scoreCondition } 

As you can see, Kotlin offers a lot of flexibility in how you choose to express your code. There are countless variations of my examples and probably ways I haven't even discovered yet. I hope this helps!

Answer 23

In Kotlin, if statements are expressions. So the following code is equivalent:

if (a) b else c

The distinction between expression and statement is important here. In Java/C#/JavaScript, if forms a statement, meaning that it does not resolve to a value. More concretely, you can't assign it to a variable.

// Valid Kotlin, but invalid Java/C#/JavaScript
var v = if (a) b else c

If you're coming from a language where if is a statement, this might seem unnatural but that feeling should soon subside.

Answer 24

Take a look at the docs:

In Kotlin, if is an expression, i.e. it returns a value. Therefore there is no ternary operator (condition ? then : else), because ordinary if works fine in this role.

Answer 25

You can do it many way in Kotlin

1. Using if

   if(a) b else c
   

2. Using when

   when (a) { 
       true -> print("value b") 
       false -> print("value c") 
       else -> {  
           print("default return in any other case") 
       } 
   }
   

3. Null Safety

   val a = b ?: c
   

Answer 26

Java

int temp = a ? b : c;

Equivalent to Kotlin：

var temp = if (a) b else c

Answer 27

With the following infix functions I can cover many common use cases pretty much the same way it can be done in Python :

class TestKotlinTernaryConditionalOperator {

    @Test
    fun testAndOrInfixFunctions() {
        Assertions.assertThat(true and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("yes")
        Assertions.assertThat(false and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("no")

        Assertions.assertThat("A" and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("yes")
        Assertions.assertThat("" and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("no")

        Assertions.assertThat(1 and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("yes")
        Assertions.assertThat(0 and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("no")

        Assertions.assertThat(Date() and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("yes")
        @Suppress("CAST_NEVER_SUCCEEDS")
        Assertions.assertThat(null as Date? and "yes" or "no").isEqualTo("no")
    }
}

infix fun <E> Boolean?.and(other: E?): E? = if (this == true) other else null
infix fun <E> CharSequence?.and(other: E?): E? = if (!(this ?: "").isEmpty()) other else null
infix fun <E> Number?.and(other: E?): E? = if (this?.toInt() ?: 0 != 0) other else null
infix fun <E> Any?.and(other: E?): E? = if (this != null) other else null
infix fun <E> E?.or(other: E?): E? = this ?: other

Answer 28

You could define your own Boolean extension function that returns null when the Boolean is false to provide a structure similar to the ternary operator:

infix fun <T> Boolean.then(param: T): T? = if (this) param else null

This would make an a ? b : c expression translate to a then b ?: c, like so:

println(condition then "yes" ?: "no")

Update: But to do some more Java-like conditional switch you will need something like that

infix fun <T> Boolean.then(param: () -> T): T? = if (this) param() else null

println(condition then { "yes" } ?: "no") pay attention on the lambda. its content calculation should be postponed until we make sure condition is true

This one looks clumsy, that is why there is high demanded request exist to port Java ternary operator into Kotlin

Answer 29

Another short approach to use

val value : String = "Kotlin"

value ?: ""

Here kotlin itself checks null value and if it is null then it passes empty string value.

Answer 30

There is no ternary operator in Kotlin. It seems problematic at the first glance. But think we can do it with inline if else statement because this is expression here. Simply we have to do -

var number = if(n>0) "Positive" else "Negetive"

Here we can else if block too as many as we need. Like-

var number = if(n>0) "Positive" else if(n<0) "Negative" else "Zero"

So this line is so simple and much readable than ternary operator. when we use more than one ternary operator in java it seems horrible. But here we have a clear syntax. even we can write it in multiple line too.