Reputation: 1186
I am using Parse.com JS API. when using parse.user method
getCurrentUser: function getCurrentUser(callback)
{
var currentUser = Parse.User.current();
callback(currentUser);
}
That would give my back:
So since I am really interested in the attributes of this object I need to do something like this:
getCurrentUser: function getCurrentUser(callback)
{
var currentUser = Parse.User.current();
//Not quite sure why I need to do that but I fugre out I cannot not really get the user object without
var userObject = new Object();
userObject.nick = currentUser.attributes.nick;
userObject.gender = currentUser.attributes.gender;
userObject.favoriteGenre = currentUser.favoriteGenre;
callback(userObject);
}
Which seems to me a bit dirty way of doing it?
Is there a better way to overcome this obstacle?
Note that I am using the method Parse.User.current(); so I can save a call to parse.com and get the info from the local storage.
Thanks in advance!
EDIT:
I just saw I can use also:
Parse.User.current().get("nick");
Which seems cleaner, just make me think if I'll be in some case consuming my parse.com calls more than I want. Someone knows about that?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3799
Reputation: 3725
You are correct that "get" is the cleaner way. API calls are measured by client-server API calls. If you fetch the whole user object, that is one API call; if the user is loaded from localStorage it's none. Property access is a local operation that is free.
Upvotes: 2