Reputation: 2249
I've got the following function:
lines' :: [IO String]
lines' = getLine : lines'
I was hoping I could just use all the mighty list functions on this list, like filter etc. But my knowledge about the IO monad in haskell is improvable.
The list-of-io_stuff-concept convinced me after using Rx for C#.
Is there any way to do what I want in haskell ? Something like:
ten_lines :: [IO String]
ten_lines = take 10 lines'
proc_lines :: [IO String]
proc_lines = [ (l, length l) | l <- lines' ]
Thanks!
Upvotes: 4
Views: 680
Reputation: 35099
Tikhon's solution is the simplest one, but it has one major deficiency: it will not produce any results until processing the entire list and it will overflow if you process too large of a list.
A solution closer to C#'s Rx would be to use a streaming library like pipes
.
For example, you can define a Producer
that generates String
s from user input:
import Control.Monad
import Control.Proxy
lines' :: (Proxy p) => () -> Producer p String IO r
lines' () = runIdentityP $ forever $ do
str <- lift getLine
respond str
Then you can define a stage that takes 10 lines:
take' :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => Int -> () -> Pipe p a a m ()
take' n () = runIdentityP $ replicateM_ n $ do
a <- request ()
respond a
... and then a processing stage:
proc :: (Monad m, Proxy p) => () -> Pipe p String (String, Int) m r
proc () = runIdentityP $ forever $ do
str <- request ()
respond (str, length str)
... and a final output stage:
print' :: (Proxy p, Show a) => () -> Consumer p a IO r
print' () = runIdentityP $ forever $ do
a <- request ()
lift $ print a
Now you can compose those into a processing chain and run it:
main = runProxy $ lines' >-> take' 10 >-> proc >-> print'
... and it will output the processed result instantly after entering each line, rather than providing the result as a batch at the end:
$ ./pipes
Apple<Enter>
("Apple",5)
Test<Enter>
("Test",4)
123<Enter>
("123",3)
4<Enter>
("4",1)
5<Enter>
("5",1)
6<Enter>
("6",1)
7<Enter>
("7",1)
8<Enter>
("8",1)
9<Enter>
("9",1)
10<Enter>
("10",2)
$
In practice, you don't have to define these pipes yourself. You can assemble the same chain from components in the pipes
standard library:
>>> runProxy $ stdinS >-> takeB_ 10 >-> mapD (\x -> (x, length x)) >-> printD
<exact same behavior>
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 68172
There are a whole bunch of normal list functions modified to work with monads in Control.Monad
. Of particular interest to your question:
sequence :: Monad m => [m a] -> m [a]
mapM :: Monad m => (a -> m b) -> [a] -> m [b]
filterM :: Monad m => (a -> m Bool) -> [a] -> m [a]
foldM :: Monad m => (a -> b -> m a) -> a -> [b] -> m a
(sequence
and mapM
are actually exported by the prelude and available by default.)
For example, let's take a look at the type of your take 10 lines'
example:
Prelude Control.Monad> :t take 10 lines'
take 10 lines' :: [IO String]
We want to turn this [IO String]
into a single IO [String]
action. This is exactly what sequence
does! We can tell this by the type signature. So:
sequence $ take 10 lines'
will do what you want.
Most of these functions also have a version ending in _
, like sequence_
. This has exactly the same effect as the normal function except it throws away the result, returning ()
instead. That is, sequence_ :: [m a] -> m ()
. This is a good choice whenever you don't actually care about the result for two reasons: it's more explicit about your intentions and the performance can be better.
So if you wanted to print 10 lines rather than get them, you would write something like this:
printLines = putStrLn "foo" : printLines
main = sequence_ $ take 10 printLines
Upvotes: 10