Reputation: 6139
I have a std::vector
. I check its size which is 6 but when I try to access vec[6]
to check whether it will give error, I get no error but some number instead. Should not it give an error?
edit: something like:
struct Element
{
std::vector<double> face;
};
int main()
{
Element elm;
.... // insert 6 elements into elm.face
std::cout << elm.face.size() << std::endl; // answer is 6
std::cout << elm.face[6] << std::endl; // answer is some number
}
Upvotes: 34
Views: 30653
Reputation: 185
Data structures are indexed starting at 0
, so if you are accessing vec[6]
, then this is going to be out of bounds. You are likely not getting an error due to a memory issue; there could be something there from previous code you have run, or some similar error.
Upvotes: -4
Reputation: 2051
std::vector
performs bounds checking when the at()
member function is used, but it does not perform any checks with operator[]
.
When out of bounds operator[]
produces undefined results.
Upvotes: 66
Reputation: 2776
As stated in kgraney's answer, this is undefined behaviour. However, most c++ libraries have some facility to abort, or raise an exception in such cases. Usually controlled by setting or unsetting specific compiler macro's.
I have made an overview of the relevant documentation:
_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -- less safe(according to microsoft), but more standard compliant:
_SECURE_SCL -- old method of setting iterator debug level
Note that gnu and clang disable the checks by default, while microsoft has them enabled by default. If you are unaware of this, your code may run significantly slower in debug mode on a microsoft system.
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 129001
It's undefined behavior. Undefined behavior does not necessarily mean you'll get an error: you might, but you might instead get some result that doesn't make much sense.
Upvotes: 4