Reputation: 1965
I am trying to do the following (doesn't work, just shown to convey the intended behavior):
<table>
<tr>
<th>Column 1</th>
<th>Column 2</th>
<th>Column 3</th>
</tr>
{% for col1_val in col1_values %}
<tr>
<td>{{ col1_val }}</td>
<td>{{ col2_values[col1_values.index(col1_val)] }}</td>
<td>{{ col3_values[col1_values.index(col1_val)] }}</td>
</tr>
{% endfor %}
</table>
where the table desired is:
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
col1_values[0] col2_values[0] col3_values[0]
col1_values[1] col2_values[1] col3_values[1]
.
.
.
where col1_values are unique from each other.
How should the Jinja2 template be rewritten to achieve the desired table output? Is it possible without having to transpose the dimensions of col1_values, col2_values and col3_values? If not, what would be the most Pythonic way of doing the transpose?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 6434
Reputation: 2476
I think that you have three lists col1_values, col2_values and col3_values. In views, construct list of lists as:
col_values = zip(col1_values, col2_values, col3_values)
Pass col_values to template and do the following:
<table>
<tr>
<th>Column 1</th>
<th>Column 2</th>
<th>Column 3</th>
</tr>
{% for col1, col2, col3 in col_values %}
<tr>
<td>{{ col1 }}</td>
<td>{{ col2 }}</td>
<td>{{ col3 }}</td>
</tr>
{% endfor %}
</table>
I think this would be easy method to solve your problem. Hope it helps.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1122162
Why not use a nested list instead? Loop over a structure like:
table_values = [[col1_value_0, col2_value_0, col3_value_0], [col1_value_1, col2_value_1, col3_value_1], ...]
The zip() function can combine the 3 colX_values lists if need be:
table_rows = zip(col1_values, col2_values, col3_values)
Now you have per-row lists to loop over:
{% for col1_val, col2_val, col3_val in table_rows %}
<tr>
<td>{{ col1_val }}</td>
<td>{{ col2_val }}</td>
<td>{{ col3_val }}</td>
</tr>
{% endfor %}
Upvotes: 4