Reputation: 17596
I have several Linux (Ubuntu 10.04) processes running on my computer. If I start one of them, I can see the verbose of it on my terminal. I have an other process that start a dozen of those processes so that they run in background. However, I would like to watch the output of one of these processes to see if the output is still ok and there are no error message. I know I could send everything into a log message, however, this would just use too much disk space. So, is there a way to "catch" the output of a running process in Linux using it's process Id?
Upvotes: 4
Views: 17330
Reputation: 632
Best way to do is to check fd
folder in /proc/<PID>/fd
in my case I have a python running on the system with a different terminal
I can see its logs by :
1. Get Process ID
ps -aux | grep python
2. CD into /proc/504951/fd and view all/needed files
cd /proc/504951/fd && tail -f *
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 512
You can attach gdb to your running process and redirect stdout/err or both to some log file whenever you feel like looking at the output (make sure the files exist before redirecting):
gdb attach PID (gdb) p dup2(open("/tmp/mylogfile-stdout", 0), 1) (gdb) p dup2(open("/tmp/mylogfile-stderr", 0), 2) (gdb) detach (gdb) quit
When you want them to go back to being silent just do:
gdb attach PID (gdb) p dup2(open("/dev/null", 0), 1) (gdb) p dup2(open("/dev/null", 0), 2) (gdb) detach (gdb) quit
The 'detach' part is important, otherwise you will kill the process you're attached to when gdb exits. For more details see this question.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1
Use redirection like
yourprogram arg1 arg2 > yourprog.out
or probably even (to redirect both stderr & stdout and run in the background)
yourprogram arg1 arg2 > yourprog.out 2>&1 &
In a different terminal, do
tail -f yourprog.out
With the -f
option, the tail
command will notice when the file is growing and will display its newest lines
But I can't see portable way to redirect after. Maybe screen
, batch
, at
, cron
might help you. Or opening the /proc/1234/fd/1
...
BTW, I am surprised you don't have enough temporary disk space for your output...
And I do like running M-x shell
under emacs, and running my programm there.
Upvotes: 1