Reputation: 2813
I have the following piece of code:
public int makePayment(User forUser, Collection<Movie> cartItems,
Address deliverTo)
{
int returnCode = 0;
LOGGER.debug("Number of items in cart - {}", cartItems.size());
Rental rental = new Rental();
rental.setRentalID(RandomStringUtils.randomAlphanumeric(ID_LENGTH).toUpperCase());
rental.setUser(forUser); // Update reference to parent
rental.setAddress(deliverTo);
// Each rental has its own set of rented movies
Set<RentedMovie> rentedMovies = new HashSet<>(cartItems.size());
for (Iterator<Movie> iterator = cartItems.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();)
{
Movie movie = iterator.next();
RentedMovie rentedMovie = new RentedMovie();
rentedMovie.setMovie(movie);
rentedMovie.setRental(rental); // Update reference to parent
rentedMovies.add(rentedMovie);
}
rental.setRentedMovies(rentedMovies);
rentalDAO.create(rental);
Set<Rental> userRentals = userDAO.findById(forUser.getUserID()).getRentals();
userRentals.add(rental); // Add to existing set of rentals
try
{
String addressID = addressDAO.create(deliverTo);
LOGGER.debug("Delivery Address successfully inserted. Generated address ID - {}", addressID);
forUser.setRentals(userRentals);
userDAO.update(forUser); // Internally calls session.merge()
}
catch (Exception e) {
returnCode = -1;
LOGGER.error("Exception during payment - {}", e.getMessage(), e);
}
return returnCode;
}
Now when the above method completes, hibernate performs certain redundant update queries as described below:
Let's say I add 2 items to cart, so...
DEBUG PaymentService - Number of items in cart - 2
Next, a row is inserted in RENTALS
table (expected)
insert
into
rentals
(bookingDate, userID, addressID, rentalID)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?)
USER
and ADDRESS
table updated once since 1 row inserted in RENTALS
(redundant)
update
users
set
userName=?,
password=?,
firstName=?,
lastName=?,
email=?,
addressID=?
where
userID=?
update
addresses
set
line1=?,
line2=?,
city=?,
state=?,
pincode=?
where
addressID=?
MOVIES
table updated as many times as the number of items in cart (2 in this case, again redundant)
update
movies
set
movieName=?,
releaseYear=?,
rating=?,
nCopies=?,
imageUri=?,
plotLine=?
where
movieID=?
/* And another query with different movieID */
2 records inserted in RENTED_MOVIE
table (expected)
insert
into
rented_movie
(rentalID, returnDate, movieID)
values
(?, ?, ?)
/* And one more with same rentalID and diff. movieID */
And last, but not the least, a select query to RENTALS
table (Why??)
What is the reason for the above mentioned redundant queries?
I am using Hibernate 4.2.1 with MySQL 5.5
Link to Schema Diagram
Link to User.hbm.xml
Link to Rental.hbm.xml
UPDATE: It seems no matter what possible combinations of inverse
I try, I can't seem to avoid these n+2 updates (n = number of movies in cart) :(
Could someone please let me know if this is a known behavior? If yes, what is the possible workaround?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 390
Reputation: 2813
I finally managed to fix my problem. The issue was with the cascading settings. I had set it to cascasde="all"
in all associations.
I made changes to Rental.hbm.xml to set specific cascade options for an association:
<!-- n:1 mapping with User -->
<many-to-one name="user"
column="userID"
class="User"
not-null="true"
fetch="join"
cascade="none" /> <!-- No cascading required for User -->
<!-- 1:1 mapping with Address. Association is MANDATORY. -->
<many-to-one name="address"
column="addressID"
class="Address"
unique="true"
not-null="true"
cascade="persist"/> <!-- Either create a new delivery address or use an existing user address -->
<!-- m:n mapping with Movie -->
<set name="rentedMovies" table="rented_movie" lazy="true"
cascade="save-update, delete-orphan"> <!-- Selective update / delete -->
<key column="rentalID"/>
<composite-element class="RentedMovie">
<parent name="rental"/>
<property name="returnDate" column="returnDate" type="date" not-null="true"/>
<many-to-one name="movie" column="movieID" class="Movie" not-null="true" fetch="join"/>
</composite-element>
</set>
I removed the cascade from the <many-to-one name="movie" ../>
since I am updating the inventory count through an HQL by passing a list of the IDs instead of updating the property in the object itself since the latter results in N update statements.
Upvotes: 1