Reputation: 4384
I am new to Moq and testing in general so here is my noobish Q. How do I test if the Status property on Request has been set using Moq?
public class DudeManager
{
private readonly IDRepository _repo;
public DManager(IDRepository repo)
{
_repo = repo;
}
public void Create(Request r)
{
r.Status = Status.Submitted;
_repo.AddRequest(r);
}
}
Is there a better approach than the following? Maybe using VerifySet?
[TestMethod]
public void AddingNewRequestSetsStatusToSubmitted()
{
//Arrange
var mock = new Mock<IDRepository>();
var mockRequest = new Mock<Request>();
var dManager = new DManager(mock.Object);
//Act
dManager.Create(mockRequest.Object);
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(Status.Submitted, mockRequest.Object.Status);
}
EDIT: This is the approach I ended up using after all the helpful suggestions:
//Arrange
var request = new Request();
var mock = new Mock<IDRepository>();
var dManager = new DManager(mock.Object);
mock.Setup(x => x.AddRequest(It.IsAny<Request>()));
//Act
dManager.QueueNewRequest(request);
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(RequestStatus.Submitted, request.Status);
This approach seems right to me. Does anyone think otherwise?
Upvotes: 23
Views: 28901
Reputation: 13409
mock.Verify(m=>m.AddRequest(It.Is<Request>(r=>r.Status == expectedStatus)));
You can verify that the AddRequest
method gets called with parameter (Request
) which has the correct Status
. Also, mocking the Request
object is not really necessary here.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 38488
I think you should use strict behavior by default, then you can make the verification with a single call. It also makes you write your test more explicitly.
[TestMethod]
public void AddingNewRequestSetsStatusToSubmitted()
{
//Arrange
var mock = new Mock<IDRepository>(MockBehavior.Strict);
var mockRequest = new Mock<Request>(MockBehavior.Strict);
var dManager = new DManager(mock.Object);
mockRequest.SetupSet(item => item.Status = It.IsAny<StatusType>())
.Verifiable();
//Act
dManager.Create(mockRequest.Object);
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(mockRequest.Object.Status, Status.Submitted);
mock.VerifyAll();
mockRequest.VerifyAll();
}
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 4736
I think VerifySet is the right approach. It would look something like this:
//Arrange
var mock = new Mock<IDRepository>();
var mockRequest = new Mock<Request>();
// TODO: set some expectations here
var dManager = new DManager(mock.Object);
//Act
dManager.Create(mockRequest.Object);
//Assert
mockRequest.VerifySet(x => x.Status = Status.Submitted);
I believe in your case, it blows up because you haven't set up your Request mock to handle the set operation on Status.
One easy way to do that is using SetupAllProperties
, like so:
//Arrange
var mock = new Mock<IDRepository>();
var mockRequest = new Mock<Request>();
mockRequest.SetupAllProperties();
Upvotes: 39