What's the difference between Spring Data's MongoTemplate and MongoRepository?

Question

I need to write an application with which I can do complex queries using spring-data and MongoDB. I started using the MongoRepository but struggled with complex queries to find examples or understand the Syntax.

I'm talking about queries like this:

@Repository
public interface UserRepositoryInterface extends MongoRepository<User, String> {
    List<User> findByEmailOrLastName(String email, String lastName);
}

or the use of JSON based queries which I tried by trial and error because I didn't get the syntax right. Even after reading the MongoDB documentation (non-working example due to the wrong syntax).

@Repository
public interface UserRepositoryInterface extends MongoRepository<User, String> {
    @Query("'$or':[{'firstName':{'$regex':?0,'$options':'i'}},{'lastName':{'$regex':?0,'$options':'i'}}]")
    List<User> findByEmailOrFirstnameOrLastnameLike(String searchText);
} 

After reading all the documentation it seems that mongoTemplate is far better documented than MongoRepository. I'm referring to the following documentation:

http://static.springsource.org/spring-data/data-mongodb/docs/current/reference/html/

Can you tell me which is more convenient and powerful to use? mongoTemplate or MongoRepository? Are both same mature or does one lack more features than the other?

Answer 1

FWIW, regarding updates in a multi-threaded environment:

• MongoTemplate provides "atomic" out-of-the-box operations updateFirst, updateMulti, findAndModify, upsert... which allow you to modify a document in a single operation. The Update object used by these methods also allows you to target only the relevant fields.
• MongoRepository only gives you the basic CRUD operations find, insert, save, delete, which work with POJOs containing all the fields. This forces you to either update the documents in several steps (1. find the document to update, 2. modify the relevant fields from the returned POJO, and then 3. save it), or define your own update queries by hand using @Query.

In a multi-threaded environment, like e.g. a Java back-end with several REST endpoints, single-method updates are the way to go, in order to reduce the chances of two concurrent updates overwriting one another's changes.

Example: given a document like this: { _id: "ID1", field1: "a string", field2: 10.0 } and two different threads concurrently updating it...

With MongoTemplate it would look somewhat like this:

THREAD_001                                                      THREAD_002
|                                                               |
|update(query("ID1"), Update().set("field1", "another string")) |update(query("ID1"), Update().inc("field2", 5))
|                                                               |
|                                                               |

and the final state for the document is always { _id: "ID1", field1: "another string", field2: 15.0 } since each thread is accesing the DB only once and only the specified field is changed.

Whereas the same case scenario with MongoRepository would look like this:

THREAD_001                                                      THREAD_002
|                                                               |
|pojo = findById("ID1")                                         |pojo = findById("ID1")
|pojo.setField1("another string") /* field2 still 10.0 */       |pojo.setField2(pojo.getField2()+5) /* field1 still "a string" */
|save(pojo)                                                     |save(pojo)
|                                                               |
|                                                               |

and the final document being either { _id: "ID1", field1: "another string", field2: 10.0 } or { _id: "ID1", field1: "a string", field2: 15.0 } depending on which save operation hits the DB last.
_{(NOTE: Even if we used Spring Data's @Version annotation as suggested in the comments, not much would change: one of the save operations would throw an OptimisticLockingFailureException, and the final document would still be one of the above, with only one field updated instead of both.)}

So I'd say that MongoTemplate is a better option, unless you have a very elaborated POJO model or need the custom queries capabilities of MongoRepository for some reason.

Answer 2

"Convenient" and "powerful to use" are contradicting goals to some degree. Repositories are by far more convenient than templates but the latter of course give you more fine-grained control over what to execute.

As the repository programming model is available for multiple Spring Data modules, you'll find more in-depth documentation for it in the general section of the Spring Data MongoDB reference docs.

TL;DR

We generally recommend the following approach:

1. Start with the repository abstract and just declare simple queries using the query derivation mechanism or manually defined queries.
2. For more complex queries, add manually implemented methods to the repository (as documented here). For the implementation use MongoTemplate.

Details

For your example this would look something like this:

1. Define an interface for your custom code:

   interface CustomUserRepository {
   
     List<User> yourCustomMethod();
   }
   

2. Add an implementation for this class and follow the naming convention to make sure we can find the class.

   class UserRepositoryImpl implements CustomUserRepository {
   
     private final MongoOperations operations;
   
     @Autowired
     public UserRepositoryImpl(MongoOperations operations) {
   
       Assert.notNull(operations, "MongoOperations must not be null!");
       this.operations = operations;
     }
   
     public List<User> yourCustomMethod() {
       // custom implementation here
     }
   }
   

3. Now let your base repository interface extend the custom one and the infrastructure will automatically use your custom implementation:

   interface UserRepository extends CrudRepository<User, Long>, CustomUserRepository {
   
   }
   

This way you essentially get the choice: everything that just easy to declare goes into UserRepository, everything that's better implemented manually goes into CustomUserRepository. The customization options are documented here.

Answer 3

This answer may be a bit delayed, but I would recommend avoiding the whole repository route. You get very little implemented methods of any great practical value. In order to make it work you run into the Java configuration nonsense which you can spend days and weeks on without much help in the documentation.

Instead, go with the MongoTemplate route and create your own Data access layer which frees you from the configuration nightmares faced by Spring programmers. MongoTemplate is really the savior for engineers who are comfortable architecting their own classes and interactions since there is lot of flexibility. The structure can be something like this:

1. Create a MongoClientFactory class that will run at the application level and give you a MongoClient object. You can implement this as a Singleton or using an Enum Singleton (this is thread safe)
2. Create a Data access base class from which you can inherit a data access object for each domain object). The base class can implement a method for creating a MongoTemplate object which you class specific methods can use for all DB accesses
3. Each data access class for each domain object can implement the basic methods or you can implement them in the base class
4. The Controller methods can then call methods in the Data access classes as needed.