Reputation: 271
I want to find the matching item from the below given list.My List may be super large.
The very first item in the tuple "N1_10" is duplicated and matched with another item in another array
tuple in 1st array in the ListA ('N1_10', 'N2_28')
tuple in 2nd array in the ListA ('N1_10', 'N3_98')
ListA = [[('N1_10', 'N2_28'), ('N1_35', 'N2_44')],
[('N1_22', 'N3_72'), ('N1_10', 'N3_98')],
[('N2_33', 'N3_28'), ('N2_55', 'N3_62'), ('N2_61', 'N3_37')]]
what I want for the output is
output --> [('N1_10','N2_28','N3_98') , ....
and the rest whatever match one of the
key will get into same tuple]
If you guys think , changing the data structure of the ListA is better option , pls feel free to advise! Thanks for helping out!
SIMPLIFIED VERSION
List A = [[(a,x),(b,k),(c,l),(d,m)],[(e,d),(a,p),(g,s)],[...],[...]....]
wantedOutput --> [(a,x,p),(b,k),(c,l),(d,m,e),(g,s).....]
Upvotes: 2
Views: 4034
Reputation: 7000
tupleList = [(1, 2), (3, 4), (1, 4), (3, 2), (1, 2), (7, 9), (9, 8), (5, 6)]
newSetSet = set ([frozenset (aTuple) for aTuple in tupleList])
setSet = set ()
while newSetSet != setSet:
print '*'
setSet = newSetSet
newSetSet = set ()
for set0 in setSet:
merged = False
for set1 in setSet:
if set0 & set1 and set0 != set1:
newSetSet.add (set0 | set1)
merged = True
if not merged:
newSetSet.add (set0)
print [tuple (element) for element in setSet]
print [tuple (element) for element in newSetSet]
print
print [tuple (element) for element in newSetSet]
# Result: [(1, 2, 3, 4), (5, 6), (8, 9, 7)]
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3009
Does output order matter? This is the simplest way I could think of:
ListA = [[('N1_10', 'N2_28'), ('N1_35', 'N2_44')],[('N1_22', 'N3_72'), ('N1_10', 'N3_98')],
[('N2_33', 'N3_28'), ('N2_55', 'N3_62'), ('N2_61', 'N3_37')]]
idx = dict()
for sublist in ListA:
for pair in sublist:
for item in pair:
mapping = idx.get(item,set())
mapping.update(pair)
idx[item] = mapping
for subitem in mapping:
submapping = idx.get(subitem,set())
submapping.update(mapping)
idx[subitem] = submapping
for x in set([frozenset(x) for x in idx.values()]):
print list(x)
Output:
['N3_72', 'N1_22']
['N2_28', 'N3_98', 'N1_10']
['N2_61', 'N3_37']
['N2_33', 'N3_28']
['N2_55', 'N3_62']
['N2_44', 'N1_35']
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 280973
Update: After rereading your question, it appears that you're trying to create equivalence classes, rather than collecting values for keys. If
[[(1, 2), (3, 4), (2, 3)]]
should become
[(1, 2, 3, 4)]
, then you're going to need to interpret your input as a graph and apply a connected components algorithm. You could turn your data structure into an adjacency list representation and traverse it with a breadth-first or depth-first search, or iterate over your list and build disjoint sets. In either case, your code is going to suddenly involve a lot of graph-related complexity, and it'll be hard to provide any output ordering guarantees based on the order of the input. Here's an algorithm based on a breadth-first search:
import collections
# build an adjacency list representation of your input
graph = collections.defaultdict(set)
for l in ListA:
for first, second in l:
graph[first].add(second)
graph[second].add(first)
# breadth-first search the graph to produce the output
output = []
marked = set() # a set of all nodes whose connected component is known
for node in graph:
if node not in marked:
# this node is not in any previously seen connected component
# run a breadth-first search to determine its connected component
frontier = set([node])
connected_component = []
while frontier:
marked |= frontier
connected_component.extend(frontier)
# find all unmarked nodes directly connected to frontier nodes
# they will form the new frontier
new_frontier = set()
for node in frontier:
new_frontier |= graph[node] - marked
frontier = new_frontier
output.append(tuple(connected_component))
Don't just copy this without understanding it, though; understand what it's doing, or write your own implementation. You'll probably need to be able to maintain this. (I would've used pseudocode, but Python is practically as simple as pseudocode already.)
In case my original interpretation of your question was correct, and your input is a collection of key-value pairs that you want to aggregate, here's my original answer:
Original answer
import collections
clusterer = collections.defaultdict(list)
for l in ListA:
for k, v in l:
clusterer[k].append(v)
output = clusterer.values()
defaultdict(list)
is a dict
that automatically creates a list
as the value for any key that wasn't already present. The loop goes over all the tuples, collecting all values that match up to the same key, then creates a list of (key, value_list) pairs from the defaultdict.
(The output of this code is not quite in the form you specified, but I believe this form is more useful. If you want to change the form, that should be a simple matter.)
Upvotes: 3