Reputation: 8797
Whether false
is allowed to be implicitly converted to pointer is different between clang++ and g++:
g++-4.8: always a warning with or without -std=c++11
clang++ (trunk): a warning if without -std=c++11, and an error if with -std=c++11
So anyone knows why g++ and clang++ behaves differently, and who is correct? What paragraphs in C++ standard (both C++03 and C++11) talks about the situation.
Thanks.
[hidden ~]$ cat b.cpp
const char* f() { return false; }
[hidden ~]$ g++ -c b.cpp
b.cpp: In function ‘const char* f()’:
b.cpp:1:26: warning: converting ‘false’ to pointer type ‘const char*’ [-Wconversion-null]
const char* f() { return false; }
^
[hidden ~]$ g++ -std=c++11 -c b.cpp
b.cpp: In function ‘const char* f()’:
b.cpp:1:26: warning: converting ‘false’ to pointer type ‘const char*’ [-Wconversion-null]
const char* f() { return false; }
^
[hidden ~]$ clang++ -c b.cpp
b.cpp:1:26: warning: initialization of pointer of type 'const char *' to null from a constant boolean expression [-Wbool-conversion]
const char* f() { return false; }
^~~~~
1 warning generated.
[hidden ~]$ clang++ -std=c++11 -c b.cpp
b.cpp:1:26: error: cannot initialize return object of type 'const char *' with an rvalue of type 'bool'
const char* f() { return false; }
^~~~~
1 error generated.
Upvotes: 10
Views: 4887
Reputation: 15278
I'd say clang with C++11 is right:
3.9.1 Fundamental types [basic.fundamental]
6 Values of type bool are either
true
orfalse
. [ Note: There are no signed, unsigned, short, or long bool types or values. — end note ] Values of type bool participate in integral promotions (4.5).
bool
does not have value zero, so can not be converted to null pointer:
4.10 Pointer conversions [conv.ptr]
1 A null pointer constant is an integral constant expression (5.19) prvalue of integer type that evaluates to zero or a prvalue of type std::nullptr_t. A null pointer constant can be converted to a pointer type;
One might suggest conversion sequence consisting of integral promotion (bool
to int
) and null pointer conversion, but it would not be valid:
4 Standard conversions [conv]
1 Standard conversions are implicit conversions with built-in meaning. Clause 4 enumerates the full set of such conversions. A standard conversion sequence is a sequence of standard conversions in the following order:
- Zero or one conversion from the following set: lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, array-to-pointer conversion, and function-to-pointer conversion.
- Zero or one conversion from the following set: integral promotions, floating point promotion, integral conversions, floating point conversions, floating-integral conversions, pointer conversions, pointer to member conversions, and boolean conversions.
- Zero or one qualification conversion.
[ Note: A standard conversion sequence can be empty, i.e., it can consist of no conversions. — end note ] A standard conversion sequence will be applied to an expression if necessary to convert it to a required destination type.
Upvotes: 6