CODEWITHSUNDEEP
css
Stephanie Caldwell
Stephanie Caldwell

Reputation: 647

Why does my absolutely positioned table not fill its container div?

I have a table inside a div, and the table won't fill the container div. Why not?

HTML:

<div class="fill">
  <table class="table">
    ...
  </table>
</div>

CSS:

.fill {
  position:relative;
  width:100%;
  height:100%;
}

.table {
  position:absolute !important;
  left:0 !important;
  right:10px !important;
  bottom:0 !important;
  top:39px !important; 
}

The table only fills a small portion of the container div. Why?

UPDATE: Or, If I try the following, it doesn't work in Firefox, but it does in Chrome.

HTML:

<div class="fill">
  <div class="wrap">
    <table class="table">
      ...
    </table>
  </div>
</div>

CSS:

.fill {
  position:relative;
  width:100%;
  height:100%;
}

.wrap {
  position:absolute;
  left:0;
  right:0;
  top:39px;
  bottom:0;
}

.table {
  position:relative;
  height:100%;
  width:100%;
}

This second version is closer to what I want (since it DOES work in Chrome).

Upvotes: 0

Views: 1441

Answers (4)

tuespetre
tuespetre

Reputation: 1887

In regards to your original question, this is the answer to your 'why not':

If the height of the containing block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to 'auto'.

Source: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#the-height-property

Your 'fill' div is set to 100% height, but what is its parent element's height set to? And if its parent element's height is also a percentage, what is its parent's height set to, and so on?

Add borders to your updated example and you could see, the height of 'fill' is 0 as it has no parent with a specified height, and so the height of 'wrap' is also zero. Add a parent wrapper to wrap the whole example with a height of 500px or so and it works as expected in (at least) Firefox and Chrome.

CSS:

.fill {
  position:relative;
  width:100%;
  height:100%;
    border: 1px solid red;
}

.wrap {
  position:absolute;
  left:0;
  right:0;
  top:39px;
  bottom:0;
    border: 1px solid blue;
}

.table {
  position:relative;
  height:100%;
    border: 1px solid green;
}
.parent {
    height: 300px;
}

HTML:

<div class="parent">
<div class="fill">
  <div class="wrap">
    <table class="table">
        <tr><td>...</td></tr>
    </table>
  </div>
</div>
</div>

Upvotes: 2

jaredwilli
jaredwilli

Reputation: 12338

Your parent div of the table has a width and height of 100% which is going to be whatever the parent element is. The table needs to not be position: absolute, and therefore no need to have top, left, right, bottom set.

table {
    border: 1px solid blue;    
    width: 100%;
    height: 100%;
    margin: 0;
}

Here's my fiddle of what you wanted, minus the top and right offsetting you have. http://jsfiddle.net/jaredwilli/5s4DD/

You can instead use margin to set the top and right but you then cannot use the 100% width, that will not work. You can use display:inline-block, while not having a 100% width but instead dynamically setting the width to be 10px less than the width of the fill div's width using javascript but that's another thing. Same goes for the top positioning. You could do some other things too, but there's a lot of playing with things that you would need to do.

Also, you can use table, no need for a class unless you have multiple tables in the page. And remove all of the !important's from your CSS. It's never necessary to use !important, just saying.

Upvotes: 0

LCR
LCR

Reputation: 44

On .table, put width=100%

You may have to set a width for the td as well.. Depending keeping your layout structured

Upvotes: 0

L_Holcombe
L_Holcombe

Reputation: 389

Tables are special, they don't behave like other block elements. Normally, a table will be just wide enough to hold its contents, and no more. Setting a width of 100% for the table should force it to fill the space allotted for it.

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions