CODEWITHSUNDEEP
scalaaccessortraits
OlliP
OlliP

Reputation: 1585

How to initialize a trait variable that is a val

I have MyObject and MyTrait:

class MyObject(private val myname: String = "") extends MyTrait {

  _name = myname

  def foo(myname : String) {
   _name = myname
  }
}

trait MyTrait {

  protected var _name: String = _

  def name = _name

}

This works fine as this

val myObject = new MyObject("abc")
println(myObject.name)
myObject.foo("def")
println(myObject.name)

prints

abc
def

as expected.

Problem now is that I want MyTrait._name to be a val instead of a var. But there is no way I can manage to get this to compile. Any hints appreciated.

Regards, Oliver

Upvotes: 0

Views: 5534

Answers (1)

som-snytt
som-snytt

Reputation: 39577

Here is an answer that uses the very latest cutting-edge naming conventions from Rex Kerr and Martin Odersky!

Read it on the scala-debate list. And you thought they sit around working on "higher kinds" and computing with unboxed ints.

There is a PR for the style changes, but this convention will have to wait a bit.

Doc Martin says: That does look promising. I have to experiment with it a little.

So be careful with this stuff; it's experimental and probably chemically unstable.

class MyObject(override protected val initialName: String = "") extends MyTrait {

  private var myName: String = initialName

  def name_=(newName: String) {
    myName = newName
  }
  override def name = myName
}

trait MyTrait {
  protected val initialName: String = "default"
  def name = initialName
}
object Test extends App {
  val myObject = new MyObject("abc")
  println(myObject.name)
  myObject.name = "def"
  println(myObject.name)
}

The style guide has a section on brevity but is itself not brief. I'm sure there are answers on SO about "prefer def over val in traits" by Daniel Sobral. And don't forget to consult the one-question FAQ when you encounter init-order problems.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions