CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#overridingabstract
Alon Gubkin
Alon Gubkin

Reputation: 57139

An abstract method overrides an abstract method

public abstract class A
{
    public abstract void Process();
}

public abstract class B : A
{
    public abstract override void Process();
}

public class C : B
{
    public override void Process()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("abc");
    }
}

This code throws an Compilation Error: 'B' does not implement inherited abstract member 'A.Process()'.

Is there any way to do this?

Upvotes: 6

Views: 3179

Answers (4)

Sam Harwell
Sam Harwell

Reputation: 99989

The place where I've seen this sometimes is overriding a non-abstract virtual method with an abstract method. For example:

public abstract class SomeBaseType
{
    /* Override the ToString method inherited from Object with an abstract
     * method. Non-abstract types derived from SomeBaseType will have to provide
     * their own implementation of ToString() to override Object.ToString().
     */
    public abstract override string ToString();
}

public class SomeType : SomeBaseType
{
    public override string ToString()
    {
        return "This type *must* implement an override of ToString()";
    }
}

Upvotes: 4

Mark Bertenshaw
Mark Bertenshaw

Reputation: 5689

Alon -

This makes no sense. First of all, this does actually compile fine. Secondly, the abstract method you declared in A is inherited (still abstract) into B. Therefore, you have no need to declare Process() in class B.

-- Mark

Upvotes: 3

Russell Mull
Russell Mull

Reputation: 1151

Works for me in VS2008; no errors, no warnings. BUT, there's no reason to have the 'override' in B. This code is equivalent:

public abstract class A
{
    public abstract void Process();
}

public abstract class B : A
{
}

public class C : B
{
    public override void Process()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("abc");
    }
}

Upvotes: 8

Razzie
Razzie

Reputation: 31232

Just leave out the method completely in class B. B inherits it anyway from A, and since B itself is abstract, you do not explicitly need to implement it again.

Upvotes: 13

Related Questions