Reputation: 773
while( result_set.next() )
{
...
}
I have use System.nanoTime()
and calculated the time, for each iteration the time taken is in milliseconds but the overall loop takes about 16s. I am considering a possible reason that the condition test is taking a lot of time, the next()
function.
FYI I am connecting to a remote database server and the select query that I make is completed in milliseconds again calculated using the above mentioned method. Any reasons about why it's happening and how I can bring the time to iterate the resultset down to at max a second?
EDIT:
I am dealing with about 4000 records and each record contians about 10 columns each having a size of about 10 chars
EDIT2 Thanks setFetchsize() did the magic, awesome, awesome
Upvotes: 18
Views: 15698
Reputation: 36630
I have set up a table with 4000 rows and 10 columns with 10 characters each and made a simple performance test using the following approach (RealTimeCounter
is a class which measures the real time between start()
and stop()
):
List<String> myResult = new ArrayList<>();
ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM Performance");
RealTimeCounter rtc = new RealTimeCounter();
rtc.start();
while(rs.next()) {
myResult.add(rs.getString(1));
}
rtc.stop();
System.out.println(rtc);
Results:
So, the fetch size does have a significant impact on the execution speed.
Note that, on the other hand, the fetch size has some impact on memory consumption. Interestingly enough, a quick analysis using Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory();
before and after the above code showed that the impact is much less than I would expect, though. The numbers I got are:
Upvotes: 35
Reputation: 136002
Try to change ResultSet fetch size. By default, Oracle JDBC driver receives the result set only 10 rows at a time from the database cursor. It may not significantly improve performance but there arent many other options to make driver work faster.
Upvotes: 27