Reputation: 114767
Since a while it is possible to configure maven surefire to execute jUnit tests and testNG tests in one build. I won't expand on the reasons why I'm doing that (ok, hint: testNG is our standard framework but some frameworks like jnario require jUnit).
The general way to do it is to configure the surefire plugin like this:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${surefire.version}</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>${surefire.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-testng</artifactId>
<version>${surefire.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</plugin>
This works quite well, jUnit tests and testNG tests get executed.
BUT - now I see that testNG tries to execute the jUnit tests too (and maybe vice-versa) - with no success, of course, because it won't see any of its annotations, but it looks like it re-marks the tests to "passed"... anyway, some reporting tools don't show test fails in jUnit tests anymore unless I comment the second dependency entry.
Is there any better way to configure surefire so that tests from both frameworks are executed ONLY by their test runners?
Upvotes: 7
Views: 5825
Reputation: 656
Not sure if the Running TestNG and JUnit Tests section at the bottom of this page was there in 2013, but setting junit=false
in the surefire-testng
provider seems to answer your question now.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1422
Had the same problem as you. Zero results in TestNG reports but looks like tests were runned.
Finally get this work on two separate executions of maven-surefire-plugin
dependencies
section from plugin.
<testNGArtifactName>
(and we'll need it) tests will be executed by TestNG anyway and will fail on java.lang.NullPointerException
TestNg
<executions>
like below: <plugin>
<!-- configured to work with JUnit and TestNg in same project separatelly -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<!-- whatever you need... -->
<!-- skip the default execution, we have separate for Ng and for JUnit -->
<skip>true</skip>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>TestNg-execution</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<!-- overwrite skip from default config -->
<skip>false</skip>
<includes>
<include>%regex[.*TestNg.*]</include>
</includes>
<!-- used to skip JUnit profider -->
<junitArtifactName>dev:null</junitArtifactName>
<!-- to continue on next execution in case of failures here -->
<testFailureIgnore>true</testFailureIgnore>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>JUnit-execution</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<skip>false</skip>
<!-- used to skip TestNg profider -->
<testNGArtifactName>dev:null</testNGArtifactName>
<excludes>
<exclude>%regex[.*TestNg.*]</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Tested with:
<junit-version>4.11</junit-version>
<maven-surefire-plugin-version>2.16</maven-surefire-plugin-version>
<org.testng-version>6.8.7</org.testng-version>
This configuration is the marge of ideas from:
Running TestNG-, JUnit3- and JUnit4-tests with Maven Surefire in one run,
your SUREFIRE bug report,
surefire plugin configuration
Hope it helps.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 2859
I haven't done it myself, but you could try to configure two different executions of the maven-surefire-plugin and configure one of these executions to only run JUnit tests and the other to only run testNG tests. To differentiate between JUnit und testNG tests you should either put the tests in different directories or use a distinguishable name scheme and configure each of the executions with suitable inclusion and exclusion patterns.
In theory this should work :)
Upvotes: 1