Reputation: 287
I have an extension method that is working ok to cast string values into various types, which looks something like this:
public static T ToType<T> (this string value, T property)
{
object parsedValue = default(T);
Type type = property.GetType();
try
{
parsedValue = Convert.ChangeType(value, type);
}
catch (ArgumentException e)
{
parsedValue = null;
}
return (T)parsedValue;
}
I'm unhappy about the way this looks when calling the method, however:
myObject.someProperty = stringData.ToType(myObject.someProperty);
Specifying the property just to obtain the property's type seems redundant. I would rather use a signature like this:
public static T ToType<T> (this string value, Type type) { ... }
and have T end up to be the Type of type. This would make calls much cleaner:
myObject.someProperty = stringData.ToType(typeof(decimal));
When I try to call this way, however, the editor complains that the return type of the extension method can't be infered from usage. Can I link T to the Type argument?
What am I missing?
Thanks
Upvotes: 11
Views: 32749
Reputation: 43330
Is this what you are looking for? I've added an extra catch for cases where the cast isn't valid also
Decimal i = stringName.ToType<Decimal>();
public static T ToType<T>(this string value)
{
object parsedValue = default(T);
try
{
parsedValue = Convert.ChangeType(value, typeof(T));
}
catch (InvalidCastException)
{
parsedValue = null;
}
catch (ArgumentException)
{
parsedValue = null;
}
return (T)parsedValue;
}
Edit
a shortcut approach to fix Anton's comment
if (typeof(T).IsValueType)
return default(T);
Upvotes: 17
Reputation: 8654
I'm using this for a generic conversion:
public bool ConvertTo<T>(object from, out T to) {
to = default(T);
if (from is T) { to = (T)from; return true; }
Type t = typeof(T);
//TypeConverter converter = p.converter == null ? TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(t) : p.converter;
TypeConverter converter = TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(t);
if ((converter != null) && (converter.CanConvertTo(t))) {
try { to = (T)converter.ConvertTo(null, culture, from, t); return true; }
catch { }
}
try { to = (T)Convert.ChangeType(from, t, culture); return true; }
catch { }
return false;
}
public bool ConvertTo(object from, out object to, Type type) {
to = null;
if (from.GetType() == type) { to = from; return true; }
TypeConverter converter = TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(type);
if ((converter != null) && (converter.CanConvertTo(type))) {
try { to = converter.ConvertTo(null, culture, from, type); return true; }
catch { }
}
try { to = Convert.ChangeType(from, type, culture); return true; }
catch { }
return false;
}
Before calling Convert.ChangeType
, this checks if there is a TypeConverter
for the given variable.
Call it this way:
int i = 123;
string s;
if (ConvertTo<string>(i, out s) {
// use s
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 13970
Why use property at all? Just change how you're setting your type variable to the type of your generic.
public static T ToType<T>(this string value)
{
object parsedValue = default(T);
Type type = typeof(T);
try
{
parsedValue = Convert.ChangeType(value, type);
}
catch (ArgumentException e)
{
parsedValue = null;
}
return (T) parsedValue;
}
Usage:
myObject.someProperty = stringData.ToType<decimal>()
Upvotes: 2