Reputation: 14351
As the title suggests... I'm trying to figure out the fastest way with the least overhead to determine if a record exists in a table or not.
Sample query:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
vs
SELECT COUNT(products.id) FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
vs
SELECT products.id FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
Say the ?
is swapped with 'TB100'
... both the first and second queries will return the exact same result (say... 1
for this conversation). The last query will return 'TB100'
as expected, or nothing if the id
is not present in the table.
The purpose is to figure out if the id
is in the table or not. If not, the program will next insert the record, if it is, the program will skip it or perform an UPDATE query based on other program logic outside the scope of this question.
Which is faster and has less overhead? (This will be repeated tens of thousands of times per program run, and will be run many times a day).
(Running this query against M$ SQL Server from Java via the M$ provided JDBC driver)
Upvotes: 219
Views: 670898
Reputation: 1696
Returning a simple True/False
(1 | 0) in MySQL/MariaDB
:
SELECT
EXISTS(
SELECT TRUE FROM <table>
WHERE <condition>
)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 538
SELECT IIF(EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM products WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE products.id = ?), 1, 0);
This is the fastest way because:
EXISTS
rather than COUNT
or SELECT TOP 1
. This is the database native way of determining whether a row exists.NOLOCK
to avoid contention.Additionally, this is more ergonomic than a CASE
expression.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1179
Select count(*) as RecordsExists from
( SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM
Your-Table-Name
WHERE Column-Name-A='Y' or Column-Name-A ='N'
)
as x
This Statement will get you the Records Count Based on Inner Statement whether the Records exists or not. It is divided into 2 parts
- The Inner Nested Statement will send you the Records whether it exists or not
- The Outer Statement will give you the count based on the Records provided by the inner Statement.
- If the inner statement gives you "No Records" then the Outer Statement will give you "0"
- If the inner statement gives you "1 Record" then the Outer Statement will give you "1"
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 469
May you wanna try my way:
IF (SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM [TableName]) = 1
BEGIN
--Do work
END
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 22409
SQL SERVER 2012+
SELECT IIF((SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM dbo.[YourTable] WHERE [YourColumn] = [YourValue]) IS NULL, 0, 1)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 8566
For MySql you can use LIMIT like below (Example shows in PHP)
$sql = "SELECT column_name FROM table_name WHERE column_name = 'your_value' LIMIT 1";
$result = $conn->query($sql);
if ($result -> num_rows > 0) {
echo "Value exists" ;
} else {
echo "Value not found";
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 18559
EXISTS
(or NOT EXISTS
) is specially designed for checking if something exists and therefore should be (and is) the best option. It will halt on the first row that matches so it does not require a TOP
clause and it does not actually select any data so there is no overhead in size of columns. You can safely use SELECT *
here - no different than SELECT 1
, SELECT NULL
or SELECT AnyColumn
... (you can even use an invalid expression like SELECT 1/0
and it will not break).
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM Products WHERE id = ?)
BEGIN
--do what you need if exists
END
ELSE
BEGIN
--do what needs to be done if not
END
Upvotes: 279
Reputation: 449
For those stumbling upon this from MySQL or Oracle background - MySQL supports the LIMIT clause to select a limited number of records, while Oracle uses ROWNUM.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4309
Don't think anyone has mentioned it yet, but if you are sure the data won't change underneath you, you may want to also apply the NoLock hint to ensure it is not blocked when reading.
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM dbo.[YourTable] WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE [YourColumn] = [YourValue])
THEN CAST (1 AS BIT)
ELSE CAST (0 AS BIT) END
Upvotes: 13
Reputation: 676
Below is the simplest and fastest way to determine if a record exists in database or not Good thing is it works in all Relational DB's
SELECT distinct 1 products.id FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 6826
SELECT TOP 1 products.id FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
will outperform all of your suggestions as it will terminate execution after it finds the first record.
Upvotes: 214
Reputation: 5708
You can also use
If EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM dbo.T1 WHERE T1.Name='Scot')
BEGIN
--<Do something>
END
ELSE
BEGIN
--<Do something>
END
Upvotes: 11
Reputation: 426
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS (SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM dbo.[YourTable]
WHERE [YourColumn] = [YourValue])
THEN CAST (1 AS BIT)
ELSE CAST (0 AS BIT) END
This approach returns a boolean for you.
Upvotes: 18
Reputation: 2452
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM products WHERE products.id = ?;
This is the cross relational database solution that works in all databases.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1
I've used this in the past and it doesn't require a full table scan to see if something exists. It's super fast...
UPDATE TableName SET column=value WHERE column=value
IF @@ROWCOUNT=0
BEGIN
--Do work
END
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1
create or replace procedure ex(j in number) as
i number;
begin
select id into i from student where id=j;
if i is not null then
dbms_output.put_line('exists');
end if;
exception
when no_data_found then
dbms_output.put_line(i||' does not exists');
end;
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2930
Nothing can beat -
SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM products WHERE id = 'some value';
You don't need to count to know if there is a data in table. And don't use alias when not necessary.
Upvotes: 31