CODEWITHSUNDEEP
performancex86kernelsystem-calls
Alex Shpilkin
Alex Shpilkin

Reputation: 787

How do SYSCALL/SYSRET instructions perform across x86 CPUs?

SYSCALL and SYSRET (and their 32-bit-only Intel counterparts SYSENTER and SYSEXIT) are usually described as a “generally faster” way to enter and exit supervisor mode in x86 processors than call gates or software interrupts, but the exact figures underlying this claim remain largely undocumented. In particular, all of the Intel or AMD optimization guides I was able to find contain no mention of these instructions at all. So:

Depending on the order of magnitude of this number, more detailed questions may be relevant:

Assume 64-bit code on the userspace side, no additional address-space switches (writes to CR3) and even matching SYSCALL and SYSRET pairs if it matters.

Upvotes: 18

Views: 2558

Answers (1)

Bruce Merry
Bruce Merry

Reputation: 790

I was curious too so I've written some basic bare-metal code to benchmark it: just a loop that calls syscall 1000000 times in a loop, with the syscall handler just running sysret and nothing else. On my Ryzen 7 3700X it averages 78 cycles for the call+return.

Obviously that's an artificial benchmark, because a real system call handler will likely need to do some things like switch stacks and perform Spectre mitigations. But it gives an idea of the order-of-magnitude, which is less than a cache miss.

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions