Reputation: 413
Suppose we have the following:
function Super() {
// init code
}
function Sub() {
Super.call(this);
// other init code
}
Sub.prototype = new Super();
var sub = new Sub();
Then, in some other part of our ocde, we can use either of the following to check for the relationship:
sub instanceof Super;
or
Super.prototype.isPrototypeOf( sub )
Either way, we need to have both the object (sub), and the parent constructor (Super). So, is there any reason why you'd use one vs the other? Is there some other situation where the distinction is more clear?
I've already carefully read 2464426, but didn't find a specific enough answer.
Upvotes: 41
Views: 15567
Reputation: 2040
Just complement @apsillers's answer
object instanceof constructor
var superProto = {}
// subProto.__proto__.__proto__ === superProto
var subProto = Object.create(superProto);
subProto.someProp = 5;
// sub.__proto__.__proto__ === subProto
var sub = Object.create(subProto);
console.log(superProto.isPrototypeOf(sub)); // true
console.log(sub instanceof superProto); // TypeError: Right-hand side of 'instanceof' is not callable
// helper utility to see if `o1` is
// related to (delegates to) `o2`
function isRelatedTo(o1, o2) {
function F(){}
F.prototype = o2;
// ensure the right-hand side of 'instanceof' is callable
return o1 instanceof F;
}
isRelatedTo( b, a );
TypeError: Right-hand side of 'instanceof' is not callable
instanceof
need the right-hand value to be callable, which means it must be a function(MDN call it as the constructor)
and instanceof
tests the presence of constructor.prototype
in object's prototype chain.
but isPrototypeOf()
don't have such limit. While instanceof
checks superProto.prototype
, isPrototypeOf()
checks superProto
directly.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 7450
According to this MDN Ref:
isPrototypeOf()
differs from theinstanceof
operator. In the expressionobject instanceof AFunction
, the object prototype chain is checked againstAFunction.prototype
, not againstAFunction
itself.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 19
var neuesArray = Object.create(Array);
Array.isPrototypeOf(neuesArray); // true
neuesArray instanceof Array // false
neuesArray instanceof Object // true
Array.isArray(neuesArray); // false
Array.prototype.isPrototypeOf(neuesArray); // false
Object.prototype.isPrototypeOf(neuesArray); // true
Do you understand my friend :) - is simple
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 116020
Imagine you don't use constructors in your code, but instead use Object.create
to generate objects with a particular prototype. Your program might be architected to use no constructors at all:
var superProto = {
// some super properties
}
var subProto = Object.create(superProto);
subProto.someProp = 5;
var sub = Object.create(subProto);
console.log(superProto.isPrototypeOf(sub)); // true
console.log(sub instanceof superProto); // TypeError
Here, you don't have a constructor function to use with instanceof
. You can only use subProto.isPrototypeOf(sub)
.
Upvotes: 45
Reputation: 50807
It makes little difference when you use constructor functions. instanceof
is a little cleaner, perhaps. But when you don't...:
var human = {mortal: true}
var socrates = Object.create(human);
human.isPrototypeOf(socrates); //=> true
socrates instanceof human; //=> ERROR!
So isPrototypeOf
is more general.
Upvotes: 13