CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#linq
Brennan
Brennan

Reputation: 11686

How would you do a "not in" query with LINQ?

I have two collections which have property Email in both collections. I need to get a list of the items in the first list where Email does not exist in the second list. With SQL I would just use "not in", but I do not know the equivalent in LINQ. How is that done?

So far I have a join, like...

var matches = from item1 in list1
join item2 in list2 on item1.Email equals item2.Email
select new { Email = list1.Email };

But I cannot join since I need the difference and the join would fail. I need some way of using Contains or Exists I believe. I just have not found an example to do that yet.

Upvotes: 349

Views: 405296

Answers (16)

Amy B
Amy B

Reputation: 110201

items in the first list where the Email does not exist in the second list.

from item1 in List1
where !list2.Any(item2 => item2.Email == item1.Email)
select item1;

Upvotes: 63

Robert Rouse
Robert Rouse

Reputation: 4851

I don't know if this will help you but..

NorthwindDataContext dc = new NorthwindDataContext();    
dc.Log = Console.Out;

var query =    
    from c in dc.Customers    
    where !(from o in dc.Orders    
            select o.CustomerID)    
           .Contains(c.CustomerID)    
    select c;

foreach (var c in query) Console.WriteLine( c );

from The NOT IN clause in LINQ to SQL by Marco Russo

Upvotes: 340

Arup Mahapatra
Arup Mahapatra

Reputation: 1

 DynamicWebsiteEntities db = new DynamicWebsiteEntities();
    var data = (from dt_sub in db.Subjects_Details
                                //Sub Query - 1
                            let sub_s_g = (from sg in db.Subjects_In_Group
                                           where sg.GroupId == groupId
                                           select sg.SubjectId)
                            //Where Cause
                            where !sub_s_g.Contains(dt_sub.Id) && dt_sub.IsLanguage == false
                            //Order By Cause
                            orderby dt_sub.Subject_Name

                            select dt_sub)
                           .AsEnumerable();
                  
                                SelectList multiSelect = new SelectList(data, "Id", "Subject_Name", selectedValue);

    //======================================OR===========================================

    var data = (from dt_sub in db.Subjects_Details

                               
                            //Where Cause
                            where !(from sg in db.Subjects_In_Group
                                           where sg.GroupId == groupId
                                           select sg.SubjectId).Contains(dt_sub.Id) && dt_sub.IsLanguage == false

                            //Order By Cause
                            orderby dt_sub.Subject_Name

                            select dt_sub)

                           .AsEnumerable();

Upvotes: 0

Echostorm
Echostorm

Reputation: 9814

You want the Except operator.

var answer = list1.Except(list2);

Better explanation here: https://learn.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/charlie/linq-farm-more-on-set-operators

NOTE: This technique works best for primitive types only, since you have to implement an IEqualityComparer to use the Except method with complex types.

Upvotes: 362

nzrytmn
nzrytmn

Reputation: 6961

Alternatively you can do like this:

var result = list1.Where(p => list2.All(x => x.Id != p.Id));

Upvotes: 3

Janis S.
Janis S.

Reputation: 2626

One could also use All()

var notInList = list1.Where(p => list2.All(p2 => p2.Email != p.Email));

Upvotes: 8

mshwf
mshwf

Reputation: 7469

For anyone who also wants to use a SQL-alike IN operator in C#, download this package :

Mshwf.NiceLinq

It has In and NotIn methods:

var result = list1.In(x => x.Email, list2.Select(z => z.Email));

Even you can use it this way

var result = list1.In(x => x.Email, "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]");

Upvotes: 1

StriplingWarrior
StriplingWarrior

Reputation: 156708

For people who start with a group of in-memory objects and are querying against a database, I've found this to be the best way to go:

var itemIds = inMemoryList.Select(x => x.Id).ToArray();
var otherObjects = context.ItemList.Where(x => !itemIds.Contains(x.Id));

This produces a nice WHERE ... IN (...) clause in SQL.

Upvotes: 76

Marten Jacobs
Marten Jacobs

Reputation: 307

Couldn't you do an outer join, only selecting the items from the first list if the group is empty? Something like:

Dim result = (From a In list1
              Group Join b In list2 
                  On a.Value Equals b.Value 
                  Into grp = Group
              Where Not grp.Any
              Select a)

I'm unsure whether this would work in any sort of efficient way with the Entity framework.

Upvotes: 0

DevT
DevT

Reputation: 4933

You can use a combination of Where and Any for finding not in:

var NotInRecord =list1.Where(p => !list2.Any(p2 => p2.Email  == p.Email));

Upvotes: 21

Tarik
Tarik

Reputation: 11209

I did not test this with LINQ to Entities:

NorthwindDataContext dc = new NorthwindDataContext();    
dc.Log = Console.Out;

var query =    
    from c in dc.Customers 
    where !dc.Orders.Any(o => o.CustomerID == c.CustomerID)   
    select c;

Alternatively:

NorthwindDataContext dc = new NorthwindDataContext();    
dc.Log = Console.Out;

var query =    
    from c in dc.Customers 
    where dc.Orders.All(o => o.CustomerID != c.CustomerID)   
    select c;

foreach (var c in query) 
    Console.WriteLine( c );

Upvotes: 0

Chintan Udeshi
Chintan Udeshi

Reputation: 75

You can take both the collections in two different lists, say list1 and list2.

Then just write

list1.RemoveAll(Item => list2.Contains(Item));

This will work.

Upvotes: 5

Brett
Brett

Reputation: 8745

In the case where one is using the ADO.NET Entity Framework, EchoStorm's solution also works perfectly. But it took me a few minutes to wrap my head around it. Assuming you have a database context, dc, and want to find rows in table x not linked in table y, the complete answer answer looks like:

var linked =
  from x in dc.X
  from y in dc.Y
  where x.MyProperty == y.MyProperty
  select x;
var notLinked =
  dc.X.Except(linked);

In response to Andy's comment, yes, one can have two from's in a LINQ query. Here's a complete working example, using lists. Each class, Foo and Bar, has an Id. Foo has a "foreign key" reference to Bar via Foo.BarId. The program selects all Foo's not linked to a corresponding Bar.

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        // Creates some foos
        List<Foo> fooList = new List<Foo>();
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 1, BarId = 11 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 2, BarId = 12 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 3, BarId = 13 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 4, BarId = 14 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 5, BarId = -1 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 6, BarId = -1 });
        fooList.Add(new Foo { Id = 7, BarId = -1 });

        // Create some bars
        List<Bar> barList = new List<Bar>();
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 11 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 12 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 13 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 14 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 15 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 16 });
        barList.Add(new Bar { Id = 17 });

        var linked = from foo in fooList
                     from bar in barList
                     where foo.BarId == bar.Id
                     select foo;
        var notLinked = fooList.Except(linked);
        foreach (Foo item in notLinked)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(
                String.Format(
                "Foo.Id: {0} | Bar.Id: {1}",
                item.Id, item.BarId));
        }
        Console.WriteLine("Any key to continue...");
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

class Foo
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int BarId { get; set; }
}

class Bar
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
}

Upvotes: 7

Ryan Lundy
Ryan Lundy

Reputation: 210360

While Except is part of the answer, it's not the whole answer. By default, Except (like several of the LINQ operators) does a reference comparison on reference types. To compare by values in the objects, you'll have to

  • implement IEquatable<T> in your type, or
  • override Equals and GetHashCode in your type, or
  • pass in an instance of a type implementing IEqualityComparer<T> for your type

Upvotes: 3

Inisheer
Inisheer

Reputation: 20794

Example using List of int for simplicity.

List<int> list1 = new List<int>();
// fill data
List<int> list2 = new List<int>();
// fill data

var results = from i in list1
              where !list2.Contains(i)
              select i;

foreach (var result in results)
    Console.WriteLine(result.ToString());

Upvotes: 1

tvanfosson
tvanfosson

Reputation: 532655

var secondEmails = (from item in list2
                    select new { Email = item.Email }
                   ).ToList();

var matches = from item in list1
              where !secondEmails.Contains(item.Email)
              select new {Email = item.Email};

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions