CODEWITHSUNDEEP
url
Mark
Mark

Reputation: 5653

Characters allowed in a URL

Does anyone know the full list of characters that can be used within a GET without being encoded? At the moment I am using A-Z a-z and 0-9... but I am looking to find out the full list.

I am also interested into if there is a specification released for the up coming addition of Chinese, Arabic url's (as obviously that will have a big impact on my question)

Upvotes: 271

Views: 378712

Answers (11)

Pavel Perna
Pavel Perna

Reputation: 359

You probably forgot these [\x{000ff}-\x{e007f}] and these [ء-ي] characters ( IDN )

Upvotes: 0

mgutt
mgutt

Reputation: 6177

I tested it by requesting my website (apache) with all available chars on my german keyboard as URL parameter:

http://example.com/?^1234567890ß´qwertzuiopü+asdfghjklöä#<yxcvbnm,.-°!"§$%&/()=? `QWERTZUIOPÜ*ASDFGHJKLÖÄ\'>YXCVBNM;:_²³{[]}\|µ@€~

These were not encoded:

^0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ,.-!/()=?`*;:_{}[]\|~

Not encoded after urlencode():

0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.-_

Not encoded after rawurlencode():

0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.-_~

Note: Before PHP 5.3.0 rawurlencode() encoded ~ because of RFC 1738. But this was replaced by RFC 3986 so its safe to use, now. But I do not understand why for example {} are encoded through rawurlencode() because they are not mentioned in RFC 3986.

An additional test I made was regarding auto-linking in mail texts. I tested Mozilla Thunderbird, aol.com, outlook.com, gmail.com, gmx.de and yahoo.de and they fully linked URLs containing these chars:

0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.-_~+#,%&=*;:@

Of course the ? was linked, too, but only if it was used once.

Some people would now suggest to use only the rawurlencode() chars, but did you ever hear that someone had problems to open these websites?

Asterisk
http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://google.com

Colon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About

Plus
https://plus.google.com/+google

At sign, Colon, Comma and Exclamation mark
https://www.google.com/maps/place/USA/@36.2218457,...

Because of that these chars should be usable unencoded without problems. Of course you should not use &; because of encoding sequences like &amp;. The same reason is valid for % as it used to encode chars in general. And = as it assigns a value to a parameter name.

Finally I would say its ok to use these unencoded:

0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ.-_~!+,*:@

But if you expect randomly generated URLs you should not use punctuation marks like .!, because some mail apps will not auto-link them:

http://example.com/?foo=bar! < last char not linked

Upvotes: 28

William Entriken
William Entriken

Reputation: 39243

This answer discusses characters may be included inside a URL fragment part without being escaped. I'm posting a separate answer since this part is slightly different than (and can be used in conjunction with) other excellent answers here.

The fragment part is not sent to the server and it is the characters that go after # in this example:

https://example.com/#STUFF-HERE

Specification

The relevant specifications in RFC 3986 are:

  fragment    = *( pchar / "/" / "?" )
  pchar       = unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"
  unreserved  = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"
  sub-delims  = "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")" / "*" / "+" / "," / ";" / "="

This also references rules in RFC 2234

  ALPHA       =  %x41-5A / %x61-7A   ; A-Z / a-z
  DIGIT       =  %x30-39             ; 0-9

Result

So the full list, excluding escapes (pct-encoded) are:

A-Z a-z 0-9 - . _ ~ ! $ & ' ( ) * + , ; = : @ / ?

For your convenience here is a PCRE expression that matches a valid, unescaped fragment:

/^[A-Za-z0-9\-._~!$&'()*+,;=:@\/?]*$/

Encoding

Counting this up, there are:

26 + 26 + 10 + 19 = 81 code points

You could use base 81 to efficiently encode data here.

Upvotes: 8

Myles
Myles

Reputation: 21500

EDIT: As @Jukka K. Korpela correctly points out, RFC 1738 was updated by RFC 3986. This has expanded and clarified the characters valid for host, unfortunately it's not easily copied and pasted, but I'll do my best.

In first matched order:

host        = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name

IP-literal  = "[" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture  ) "]"

IPvFuture   = "v" 1*HEXDIG "." 1*( unreserved / sub-delims / ":" )

IPv6address =         6( h16 ":" ) ls32
                  /                       "::" 5( h16 ":" ) ls32
                  / [               h16 ] "::" 4( h16 ":" ) ls32
                  / [ *1( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 3( h16 ":" ) ls32
                  / [ *2( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 2( h16 ":" ) ls32
                  / [ *3( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::"    h16 ":"   ls32
                  / [ *4( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::"              ls32
                  / [ *5( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::"              h16
                  / [ *6( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::"

ls32        = ( h16 ":" h16 ) / IPv4address
                  ; least-significant 32 bits of address

h16         = 1*4HEXDIG 
               ; 16 bits of address represented in hexadecimal

IPv4address = dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet

dec-octet   = DIGIT                 ; 0-9
              / %x31-39 DIGIT         ; 10-99
              / "1" 2DIGIT            ; 100-199
              / "2" %x30-34 DIGIT     ; 200-249
              / "25" %x30-35          ; 250-255

reg-name    = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims )

unreserved  = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"     <---This seems like a practical shortcut, most closely resembling original answer

reserved    = gen-delims / sub-delims

gen-delims  = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "@"

sub-delims  = "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")"
              / "*" / "+" / "," / ";" / "="

pct-encoded = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG

Original answer from RFC 1738 specification:

Thus, only alphanumerics, the special characters "$-_.+!*'(),", and reserved characters used for their reserved purposes may be used unencoded within a URL.

^ obsolete since 1998.

Upvotes: 222

Grim
Grim

Reputation: 1974

If you like to give a special kind of experience to the users you could use pushState to bring a wide range of characters to the browser's url:

enter image description here

var u="";var tt=168;
for(var i=0; i< 250;i++){
 var x = i+250*tt;
console.log(x);
 var c = String.fromCharCode(x);
 u+=c; 
}
history.pushState({},"",250*tt+u);

Upvotes: 0

slacy
slacy

Reputation: 11763

The full list of the 66 unreserved characters is in RFC3986, here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-2.3

This is any character in the following regex set:

[A-Za-z0-9_.\-~]

Upvotes: 44

Cyker
Cyker

Reputation: 10894

RFC3986 defines two sets of characters you can use in a URI:

  • Reserved Characters: :/?#[]@!$&'()*+,;=

    reserved = gen-delims / sub-delims

    gen-delims = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "@"

    sub-delims = "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")" / "*" / "+" / "," / ";" / "="

    The purpose of reserved characters is to provide a set of delimiting characters that are distinguishable from other data within a URI. URIs that differ in the replacement of a reserved character with its corresponding percent-encoded octet are not equivalent.

  • Unreserved Characters: A-Za-z0-9-_.~

    unreserved = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"

    Characters that are allowed in a URI but do not have a reserved purpose are called unreserved.

Upvotes: 15

Amber
Amber

Reputation: 526483

The characters allowed in a URI are either reserved or unreserved (or a percent character as part of a percent-encoding)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent-encoding#Types_of_URI_characters

says these are RFC 3986 unreserved characters (sec. 2.3) as well as reserved characters (sec 2.2) if they need to retain their special meaning. And also a percent character as part of a percent-encoding.

Upvotes: 46

AdaTheDev
AdaTheDev

Reputation: 147224

From here

Thus, only alphanumerics, the special characters $-_.+!*'(), and reserved characters used for their reserved purposes may be used unencoded within a URL.

Upvotes: 13

dajobe
dajobe

Reputation: 5036

The upcoming change is for chinese, arabic domain names not URIs. The internationalised URIs are called IRIs and are defined in RFC 3987. However, having said that I'd recommend not doing this yourself but relying on an existing, tested library since there are lots of choices of URI encoding/decoding and what are considered safe by specification, versus what are safe by actual use (browsers).

Upvotes: 3

McDowell
McDowell

Reputation: 108859

These are listed in RFC3986. See the Collected ABNF for URI to see what is allowed where and the regex for parsing/validation.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions