Reputation: 9587
I'm trying to put together an Angular directive that will be a replacement for adding
ng-disabled="!canSave(schoolSetup)"
On a form button element where canSave
is a function being defined in a controller something like the following where the parameter is the name of the form.
$scope.canSave = function(form) {
return form.$dirty && form.$valid;
};
Ideally I'd love the directive on the submit button to look like this.
can-save="schoolSetup"
Where the string is the name of the form.
So... how would you do this? This is as far as I could get...
angular.module('MyApp')
.directive('canSave', function () {
return function (scope, element, attrs) {
var form = scope.$eval(attrs.canSave);
function canSave()
{
return form.$dirty && form.$valid;;
}
attrs.$set('disabled', !canSave());
}
});
But this obviously doesn't bind properly to the form model and only works on initialisation. Is there anyway to bind the ng-disabled directive from within this directive or is that the wrong approach too?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 265
Reputation: 1209
angular.module('MyApp')
.directive('canSave', function () {
return function (scope, element, attrs) {
var form = scope.$eval(attrs.canSave);
scope.$watch(function() {
return form.$dirty && form.$valid;
}, function(value) {
value = !!value;
attrs.$set('disabled', !value);
});
}
});
Plunker: http://plnkr.co/edit/0SyK8M
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 54504
You can pass the function call to the directive like this
function Ctrl($scope) {
$scope.canSave = function () {
return form.$dirty && form.$valid;
};
}
app.directive('canSave', function () {
return {
scope: {
canSave: '&'
},
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
attrs.$set('disabled', !scope.canSave());
}
}
});
This is the template
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="Ctrl">
<div can-save="canSave()">test</div>
</div>
You can see the function is called from the directive. Demo
Upvotes: 2