Reputation: 4759
I'm just now learning about python OOP. In some framework's source code, i came across return super(...
and wondered if there was a difference between the two.
class a(object):
def foo(self):
print 'a'
class b(object):
def foo(self):
print 'b'
class A(a):
def foo(self):
super(A, self).foo()
class B(b):
def foo(self):
return super(B, self).foo()
>>> aie = A(); bee = B()
>>> aie.foo(); bee.foo()
a
b
Looks the same to me. I know that OOP can get pretty complicated if you let it, but i don't have the wherewithal to come up with a more complex example at this point in my learning. Is there a situation where returning super
would differ from calling super
?
Upvotes: 17
Views: 16882
Reputation: 129059
Yes. Consider the case where rather than just printing, the superclass's foo
returned something:
class BaseAdder(object):
def add(self, a, b):
return a + b
class NonReturningAdder(BaseAdder):
def add(self, a, b):
super(NonReturningAdder, self).add(a, b)
class ReturningAdder(BaseAdder):
def add(self, a, b):
return super(ReturningAdder, self).add(a, b)
Given two instances:
>>> a = NonReturningAdder()
>>> b = ReturningAdder()
When we call foo
on a
, seemingly nothing happens:
>>> a.add(3, 5)
When we call foo
on b
, however, we get the expected result:
>>> b.add(3, 5)
8
That's because while both NonReturningAdder
and ReturningAdder
call BaseAdder
's foo
, NonReturningAdder
discards its return value, whereas ReturningAdder
passes it on.
Upvotes: 27