Reputation: 4516
Why is my for for-each loop not iterating over my JavaScript associative array object?
// Defining an array
var array = [];
// Assigning values to corresponding keys
array["Main"] = "Main page";
array["Guide"] = "Guide page";
array["Articles"] = "Articles page";
array["Forum"] = "Forum board";
// Expected: loop over every item,
// yet it logs only "last" assigned value - "Forum"
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
console.log(array[i]);
}
jQuery each()
could be helpful: https://api.jquery.com/jQuery.each/
Upvotes: 223
Views: 451863
Reputation: 4192
If Node.js or the browser supports Object.entries()
, it can improve upon Object.keys()
(as in Pointy's answer).
const h = {
a: 1,
b: 2
};
Object.entries(h).forEach(([key, value]) => console.log(value));
// logs 1, 2
In this example, forEach
uses destructuring assignment of an array.
Upvotes: 14
Reputation: 165
const myObject = {
name: "Alice",
age: 30,
city: "Wonderland"
};
Object.values(myObject).forEach((key) => {
console.log(${key}
);
});
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 293
It seems like almost every answer is not what was asked at the very first place.
It's seems bit off that foreach-loop does not work. and simple for-loop will not work as well because length property will be zero in case of associative arrays(one of the fallback). but for-in do the thing for associative array
// Defining an array
var array = [];
// Assigning values to corresponding keys
array["Main"] = "Main page";
array["Guide"] = "Guide page";
array["Articles"] = "Articles page";
array["Forum"] = "Forum board";
// Expected: loop over every item,
// yet it logs only "last" assigned value - "Forum"
for (var index in array) {
console.log(index,array[index]);
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 242
You can do this:
var array = [];
// Assigning values to corresponding keys
array[0] = "Main page";
array[1] = "Guide page";
array[2] = "Articles page";
array[3] = "Forum board";
array.forEach(value => {
console.log(value)
})
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 29
var obj = {
no: ["no", 32],
nt: ["no", 32],
nf: ["no", 32, 90]
};
count = -1; // Which must be a static value
for (i in obj) {
count++;
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
console.log(obj[i][count])
};
};
In this code I used the brackets method for call values in an array because it contained an array. However, briefly the idea which a variable i
has a key of property and with a loop called both values of the associative array.
It is the perfect method.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 6908
There are some straightforward examples already, but I notice from how you've worded your question that you probably come from a PHP background, and you're expecting JavaScript to work the same way -- it does not. A PHP array
is very different from a JavaScript Array
.
In PHP, an associative array can do most of what a numerically-indexed array can (the array_*
functions work, you can count()
it, etc.). You simply create an array and start assigning to string indexes instead of numeric.
In JavaScript, everything is an object (except for primitives: string, numeric, boolean), and arrays are a certain implementation that lets you have numeric indexes. Anything pushed to an array will affect its length
, and can be iterated over using Array methods (map
, forEach
, reduce
, filter
, find
, etc.) However, because everything is an object, you're always free to simply assign properties, because that's something you do to any object. Square-bracket notation is simply another way to access a property, so in your case:
array['Main'] = 'Main Page';
is actually equivalent to:
array.Main = 'Main Page';
From your description, my guess is that you want an 'associative array', but for JavaScript, this is a simple case of using an object as a hashmap. Also, I know it's an example, but avoid non-meaningful names that only describe the variable type (e.g. array
), and name based on what it should contain (e.g. pages
). Simple objects don't have many good direct ways to iterate, so often we'll turn then into arrays first using Object
methods (Object.keys
in this case -- there's also entries
and values
being added to some browsers right now) which we can loop.
// Assigning values to corresponding keys
const pages = {
Main: 'Main page',
Guide: 'Guide page',
Articles: 'Articles page',
Forum: 'Forum board',
};
Object.keys(pages).forEach((page) => console.log(page));
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 7443
This is very simple approach. The advantage is you can get keys as well:
for (var key in array) {
var value = array[key];
console.log(key, value);
}
For ES6:
array.forEach(value => {
console.log(value)
})
For ES6 (if you want the value, index and the array itself):
array.forEach((value, index, self) => {
console.log(value, index, self)
})
Upvotes: 105
Reputation: 1074385
This is (essentially) incorrect in most cases:
var array = [];
array["Main"] = "Main page";
That creates a non-element property on the array with the name Main
. Although arrays are objects, normally you don't want to create non-element properties on them.
If you want to index into array
by those names, typically you'd use a Map
or a plain object, not an array.
With a Map
(ES2015+), which I'll call map
because I'm creative:
let map = new Map();
map.set("Main", "Main page");
you then iterate it using the iterators from its values
, keys
, or entries
methods, for instance:
for (const value of map.values()) {
// Here, `value` will be `"Main page"`, etc.
}
Using a plain object, which I'll creatively call obj
:
let obj = Object.create(null); // Creates an object with no prototype
obj.Main = "Main page"; // Or: `obj["Main"] = "Main page";`
you'd then iterate its contents using Object.keys
, Object.values
, or Object.entries
, for instance:
for (const value of Object.values(proches_X)) {
// Here, `value` will be `"Main page"`, etc.
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 1209
Here is a simple way to use an associative array as a generic Object type:
Object.prototype.forEach = function(cb){
if(this instanceof Array) return this.forEach(cb);
let self = this;
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(this).forEach(
(k)=>{ cb.call(self, self[k], k); }
);
};
Object({a:1,b:2,c:3}).forEach((value, key)=>{
console.log(`key/value pair: ${key}/${value}`);
});
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 413737
The .length
property only tracks properties with numeric indexes (keys). You're using strings for keys.
You can do this:
var arr_jq_TabContents = {}; // no need for an array
arr_jq_TabContents["Main"] = jq_TabContents_Main;
arr_jq_TabContents["Guide"] = jq_TabContents_Guide;
arr_jq_TabContents["Articles"] = jq_TabContents_Articles;
arr_jq_TabContents["Forum"] = jq_TabContents_Forum;
for (var key in arr_jq_TabContents) {
console.log(arr_jq_TabContents[key]);
}
To be safe, it's a good idea in loops like that to make sure that none of the properties are unexpected results of inheritance:
for (var key in arr_jq_TabContents) {
if (arr_jq_TabContents.hasOwnProperty(key))
console.log(arr_jq_TabContents[key]);
}
edit — it's probably a good idea now to note that the Object.keys()
function is available on modern browsers and in Node etc. That function returns the "own" keys of an object, as an array:
Object.keys(arr_jq_TabContents).forEach(function(key, index) {
console.log(this[key]);
}, arr_jq_TabContents);
The callback function passed to .forEach()
is called with each key and the key's index in the array returned by Object.keys()
. It's also passed the array through which the function is iterating, but that array is not really useful to us; we need the original object. That can be accessed directly by name, but (in my opinion) it's a little nicer to pass it explicitly, which is done by passing a second argument to .forEach()
— the original object — which will be bound as this
inside the callback. (Just saw that this was noted in a comment below.)
Upvotes: 369