Reputation: 15069
There is paradox in the exception description: Nullable object must have a value (?!)
This is the problem:
I have a DateTimeExtended
class,
that has
{
DateTime? MyDataTime;
int? otherdata;
}
and a constructor
DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended myNewDT)
{
this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime.Value;
this.otherdata = myNewDT.otherdata;
}
running this code
DateTimeExtended res = new DateTimeExtended(oldDTE);
throws an InvalidOperationException
with the message:
Nullable object must have a value.
myNewDT.MyDateTime.Value
- is valid and contain a regular DateTime
object.
What is the meaning of this message and what am I doing wrong?
Note that oldDTE
is not null
. I've removed the Value
from myNewDT.MyDateTime
but the same exception is thrown due to a generated setter.
Upvotes: 274
Views: 467350
Reputation: 7261
When using LINQ extension methods (e.g. Select
, Where
), the lambda function might be converted to SQL that might not behave identically to your C# code. For instance, C#'s short-circuit evaluated &&
and ||
are converted to SQL's eager AND
and OR
. This can cause problems when you're checking for null in your lambda.
Example:
MyEnum? type = null;
Entities.Table.Where(a => type == null ||
a.type == (int)type).ToArray(); // Exception: Nullable object must have a value
Example 2:
IQueryable<LocationSummary> query = from locations in
context.Locations join devices in context.Devices on locations.Id equals devices.LocationId
select new LocationSummary
{
LocationId = locations.Id,
Device.SKU = devices.SKU ?? "Unknown", <-- could be null
LastData = locations.Samples.Any() <-- if its null, make it a nullable datatype and then you can give it nulls
? locations.Samples.Max(x => x.EndTime)
: (DateTimeOffset)null
};
Upvotes: 29
Reputation: 69968
I got this exception using EF Core 7.x:
System.InvalidOperationException: Nullable object must have a value.
With this code:
Updated = new[] { x.Updated, x.Threats.Max(tac => tac.Updated) }.Max()
Changed new[]
to List<DateTime?>
and then it worked:
Updated = new List<DateTime?> { x.Updated, x.Threats.Max(tac => tac.Updated) }.Max()
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3090
To answer your actual question, what does "Nullable object must have a value " mean?
It is actually saying "You are trying to take the .Value of a nullable object, but it is null so that can't be done.".
I think that it is a terribly-written error message. They could have just said "Nullable object must have a value in order to take it's .Value"
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 109
Use
`DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended myNewDT)
{
this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime.**GetValueOrDefault();**
this.otherdata = myNewDT.otherdata;
}`
It'll simply check the value and set Null if there is no value.
> .Value
Must only be used when you are sure it's coming. But as you are not sure, you simply use ".GetValueOrDefault()"
Explanation:
DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended myNewDT)
is a constructor for the DateTimeExtended
class, which takes another DateTimeExtended
object myNewDT
as a parameter.
this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime.GetValueOrDefault();
assigns
the value of myNewDT.MyDateTime
to the MyDateTime
property of the current instance.GetValueOrDefault()
is used to safely handle
situations where myNewDT
.MyDateTime
might be null. If
myNewDT.MyDateTime
is null, this method will return the default
value for the DateTime
type (which is DateTime.MinValue
).
this.otherdata = myNewDT.otherdata;
assigns the otherdata
property of the current instance with the value from myNewDT.otherdata`, assuming that other data is a non-nullable property.
This constructor is designed to ensure that the MyDateTime
property of the new instance is never null. It assigns a default value to MyDateTime
if myNewDT.MyDateTime
is null, making the code safer to use when you are not sure whether myNewDT.MyDateTime
will have a value or not.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1
I got this solution and it is working for me
if (myNewDT.MyDateTime == null)
{
myNewDT.MyDateTime = DateTime.Now();
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 28834
Try dropping the .value
DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended myNewDT)
{
this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime;
this.otherdata = myNewDT.otherdata;
}
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 17718
You should change the line this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime.Value;
to just this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime;
The exception you were receiving was thrown in the .Value
property of the Nullable DateTime
, as it is required to return a DateTime
(since that's what the contract for .Value
states), but it can't do so because there's no DateTime
to return, so it throws an exception.
In general, it is a bad idea to blindly call .Value
on a nullable type, unless you have some prior knowledge that that variable MUST contain a value (i.e. through a .HasValue
check).
EDIT
Here's the code for DateTimeExtended
that does not throw an exception:
class DateTimeExtended
{
public DateTime? MyDateTime;
public int? otherdata;
public DateTimeExtended() { }
public DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended other)
{
this.MyDateTime = other.MyDateTime;
this.otherdata = other.otherdata;
}
}
I tested it like this:
DateTimeExtended dt1 = new DateTimeExtended();
DateTimeExtended dt2 = new DateTimeExtended(dt1);
Adding the .Value
on other.MyDateTime
causes an exception. Removing it gets rid of the exception. I think you're looking in the wrong place.
Upvotes: 268
Reputation: 29
I got this message when trying to access values of a null valued object.
sName = myObj.Name;
this will produce error. First you should check if object not null
if(myObj != null)
sName = myObj.Name;
This works.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 19114
Looks like oldDTE.MyDateTime was null, so constructor tried to take it's Value - which threw.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 144136
In this case oldDTE is null, so when you try to access oldDTE.Value the InvalidOperationException is thrown since there is no value. In your example you can simply do:
this.MyDateTime = newDT.MyDateTime;
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4992
Assign the members directly without the .Value
part:
DateTimeExtended(DateTimeExtended myNewDT)
{
this.MyDateTime = myNewDT.MyDateTime;
this.otherdata = myNewDT.otherdata;
}
Upvotes: 2