Reputation: 2921
I am trying to put the fusion table layer data on my Google Map
but I am getting an error Request-URI Too Large. I searched a lot but couldn't find how can I make it work either by POST method or something else. The problem is the where clause
but I can't shorten the where clause. Is there anyone who can help me or guide me?
Thanks in advance for any help.
layer = new google.maps.FusionTablesLayer({
map: googleMap,
heatmap: {enabled: false},
query: {
select: "col4",
from: "tableID",
where: "",
},
styles: [{
polygonOptions: {
fillOpacity: 0.3
}
}, {
where: "col0 in ('Jefferson','Pulaski','Los Angeles','Denver','Middlesex','New Castle','Duval','Pinellas','Lee','Broward','Fulton','Cobb','Ada','Tazewell','Cook','Marion','Hendricks','Putnam','Adams','Boone','Orleans','Plymouth','Baltimore','Washington','Macomb','Genesee','Oakland','Hennepin','Jackson','Shelby','Granite','Forsyth','Mecklenburg','Wake','Douglas','Gloucester','Passaic','Bernalillo','Sandoval','Clark','New York','Montgomery','Hamilton','Tulsa','Oklahoma','Multnomah','Lane','Chester','Philadelphia','York','Lehigh','Kent','Horry','Davidson','Travis','Harris','Dallas','Fairfax','Chesterfield','King','Brown','Laramie','Kalamazoo','Cabarrus','San Diego','Pennington','Richland','Weber','Ramsey','Hartford') AND col3 in ('AL','AR','CA','CO','CT','DC','DE','FL','GA','ID','IL','IN','WV','OH','KY','LA','MA','MD','MI','MN','MO','TN','MT','NC','NE','NJ','NM','NV','NY','OK','OR','PA','RI','SC','TX','VA','VT','WA','WI','WY','SD')",
polygonOptions: {
fillColor: '#ffffff',
strokeColor: '#ff0000',
fillOpacity: 0.3
}
}],
options: {
styleId: 1,
templateId: 2
}
});
Upvotes: 3
Views: 364
Reputation: 890
Once your working with dynamic queries you' ll always hit the Request URI Too Large issue. One solution is to generate the fusion table you're querying runtime - meaning after the user selects the dynamic parameters you create the table..or more likely a view from server side (php, asp, java)- and pass the created table id to the view layer in your application. The downside is: you'll loose all dynamics since after creation the table needs to be cached on google's side to display properly (another 5-30 sec on top of table creation).
Hear my advise: FT is just not designed to display dynamically filtered data. Some small filters can be applied, e.g: filtering on a single field's single value, but that's it. To achieve what you want, you might want to consider an OpenLayers + GeoServer + WMS approach. These are open source and ~100x faster than the workaround above.
Upvotes: 3