Reputation: 15022
I use the postgres today and got a problem I dump the database that way
pg_dump zeus_development -U test > zeus_development.dump.out
what if I wnat to restore to another database zeus_production
How could I do?
Upvotes: 49
Views: 79902
Reputation: 15019
This has an answer on dba.stackexchange, which I reproduce here:
Let's define a few variables to make the rest easier to copy/paste
old_db=my_old_database
new_db=new_database_name
db_dump_file=backups/my_old_database.dump
user=postgres
The following assumes that your backup was created with the "custom" format like this:
pg_dump -U $user -F custom $old_db > "$db_dump_file"
To restore $db_dump_file
to a new database name $new_db
:
dropdb -U $user --if-exists $new_db
createdb -U $user -T template0 $new_db
pg_restore -U $user -d $new_db "$db_dump_file"
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 2273
Thanks to @mmel for the answer. But this I tweaked that works mine:
Dump:
pg_dump \
--file {filename}.tar \
--format=tar \
--no-acl \
--no-owner \
--no-privileges \
-U {username} \
-h {host} \
-p {port} \
{db-name}
Restore:
pg_restore \
--format=tar \
--no-acl \
--no-owner \
--no-privileges \
-U {username} \
-h {host} \
-p {port} \
{db-name}
{same-filename-as-dump}.tar
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 2498
If your dump does not include the name, the restore will use the DB defined in DESTINATION
. Both SOURCE
and DESTINATION
are Connection URLs.
Dump without --create
pg_dump \
--clean --if-exists \
--file ${dump_path} \
--format=directory \
--jobs 5 \
--no-acl \
--no-owner \
${SOURCE}
Restore without --create
pg_restore \
--clean --if-exists \
--dbname=${DESTINATION} \
--format=directory \
--jobs=5 \
--no-acl \
--no-owner \
$dump_path
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 172
Here's a hacky way of doing it, that only works if you can afford the space and time to use regular .sql
format, and if you can safely sed
out your database name and user.
$ pg_dump -U my_production_user -h localhost my_production > my_prod_dump.sql
$ sed -i 's/my_production_user/my_staging_user/g' my_prod_dump.sql
$ sed -i 's/my_production/my_staging/g' my_prod_dump.sql
$ mv my_prod_dump.sql my_staging_dump.sql
$ sudo su postgres -c psql
psql> drop database my_staging;
psql> create database my_staging owner my_staging_user;
psql> \c my_staging;
psql> \i my_staging_dump.sql
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2349
The PostgresSQL documentation has influenced me to use the custom format. I've been using it for years and it seems to have various advantages but your mileage may vary. That said, here is what worked for me:
pg_restore --no-owner --dbname postgres --create ~/Desktop/pg_dump
psql --dbname postgres -c 'ALTER DATABASE foodog_production RENAME TO foodog_development'
There was no foodog_development
nor foodog_production
databases existing before the sequence.
This restores the database from the dump (~/Desktop/pg_dump
) which will create it with the name it was dumped as. The rename names the DB to whatever you want.
The --no-owner
may not be needed if your user name is the same on both machines. In my case, the dump was done as user1
and the restore done as user2
. The new objects need to be owned by user2
and --no-owner
achieves this.
Upvotes: 30
Reputation: 749
Isn't it easier to simply do the following?
createdb -U test -T zeus_development zeus_production
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 11865
Simple, first create your database using template0
as your template database:
createdb -U test -T template0 zeus_production
Then, restore your dump on this database:
psql -U test zeus_production -f /path/to/zeus_development.dump.out
When restoring, always use template0
explicit, as it is always an empty and unmodifiable database. If you don't use an explicit template, PostgreSQL will assume template1
, and if it has some objects, like a table or function that your dumped database already has, you will get some errors while restoring.
Nonetheless, even if you were restoring on a database with the same name (zeus_development
) you should create (or recreate) it the same way. Unless you used -C
option while dumping (or -C
of pg_restore
if using a binary dump), which I don't recommend, because will give you less flexibility (like restoring on a different database name).
Upvotes: 50