Reputation: 3772
Several SQL languages (I mostly use postgreSQL) have a function called coalesce which returns the first non null column element for each row. This can be very efficient to use when tables have a lot of NULL
elements in them.
I encounter this in a lot of scenarios in R as well when dealing with not so structured data which has a lot of NA's in them.
I have made a naive implementation myself but it is ridiculously slow.
coalesce <- function(...) {
apply(cbind(...), 1, function(x) {
x[which(!is.na(x))[1]]
})
}
a <- c(1, 2, NA, 4, NA)
b <- c(NA, NA, NA, 5, 6)
c <- c(7, 8, NA, 9, 10)
coalesce(a,b,c)
# [1] 1 2 NA 4 6
Is there any efficient way to implement coalesce
in R?
Upvotes: 59
Views: 36101
Reputation: 38520
Another apply method, with mapply
.
mycoalesce <- function(...) {
temp <- c(...)
temp[!is.na(temp)][1]
}
mapply(mycoalesce, a, b, c)
[1] 1 2 NA 4 6
This selects the first non-NA value if more than one exists. The last non-missing element could be selected using tail
.
Maybe a bit more speed could be squeezed out of this alternative using the bare bones .mapply
function, which looks a little different.
unlist(.mapply(function(...) {temp <- c(...); temp[!is.na(temp)][1]},
dots=list(a, b, c), MoreArgs=NULL))
[1] 1 2 NA 4 6
.mapply
differs in important ways from its non-dotted cousin.
Map
) and so must be wrapped in some function like unlist
or c
to return a vector.mapply
, the moreArgs argument does not have a default, so must explicitly be fed NULL.Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 4930
An elegant solution in BASE is to define:
coalesce <- function(...) na.omit(c(...))[1]
So for vectors:
a <- c(1, 2, NA, 4, NA)
b <- c(NA, NA, NA, 5, 6)
c <- c(7, 8, NA, 9, 10)
The output is the desired:
> mapply(coalesce, a, b,c)
[1] 1 2 NA 4 6
On my machine this beats the accepted answer using Reduce
.
> microbenchmark(coalesce(a,b,c),coalesce2(a,b,c))
Unit: microseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
coalesce(a, b, c) 5.6 5.7 6.527 5.9 6.1 43.6 100
coalesce2(a, b, c) 7.6 7.9 39.191 8.0 8.4 3040.1 100
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 67818
From data.table >= 1.12.3
you can use fcoalesce
.
library(data.table)
fcoalesce(a, b, c)
# [1] 1 2 NA 4 6
fcoalesce
can also take "a single plain list, data.table or data.frame". Thus, if the vectors above were columns in a data.frame
(or a data.table
), we could simply supply the name of the data set:
d = data.frame(a, b, c)
# or d = data.table(a, b, c)
fcoalesce(d)
# [1] 1 2 NA 4 6
For more info, including a benchmark, see NEWS item #18 for development version 1.12.3.
Upvotes: 26
Reputation: 56239
Using dplyr package:
library(dplyr)
coalesce(a, b, c)
# [1] 1 2 NA 4 6
Benchamark, not as fast as accepted solution:
coalesce2 <- function(...) {
Reduce(function(x, y) {
i <- which(is.na(x))
x[i] <- y[i]
x},
list(...))
}
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
coalesce(a, b, c),
coalesce2(a, b, c)
)
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
# coalesce(a, b, c) 21.951 24.518 27.28264 25.515 26.9405 126.293 100 b
# coalesce2(a, b, c) 7.127 8.553 9.68731 9.123 9.6930 27.368 100 a
But on a larger dataset, it is comparable:
aa <- sample(a, 100000, TRUE)
bb <- sample(b, 100000, TRUE)
cc <- sample(c, 100000, TRUE)
microbenchmark::microbenchmark(
coalesce(aa, bb, cc),
coalesce2(aa, bb, cc))
# Unit: milliseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
# coalesce(aa, bb, cc) 1.708511 1.837368 5.468123 3.268492 3.511241 96.99766 100 a
# coalesce2(aa, bb, cc) 1.474171 1.516506 3.312153 1.957104 3.253240 91.05223 100 a
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 5993
Here is my solution:
coalesce <- function(x){
y <- head( x[is.na(x) == F] , 1)
return(y)
}
It returns first vaule which is not NA and it works on data.table
, for example if you want to use coalesce on few columns and these column names are in vector of strings:
column_names <- c("col1", "col2", "col3")
how to use:
ranking[, coalesce_column := coalesce( mget(column_names) ), by = 1:nrow(ranking)]
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 37101
A very simple solution is to use the ifelse
function from the base
package:
coalesce3 <- function(x, y) {
ifelse(is.na(x), y, x)
}
Although it appears to be slower than coalesce2
above:
test <- function(a, b, func) {
for (i in 1:10000) {
func(a, b)
}
}
system.time(test(a, b, coalesce2))
user system elapsed
0.11 0.00 0.10
system.time(test(a, b, coalesce3))
user system elapsed
0.16 0.00 0.15
You can use Reduce
to make it work for an arbitrary number of vectors:
coalesce4 <- function(...) {
Reduce(coalesce3, list(...))
}
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 15163
On my machine, using Reduce
gets a 5x performance improvement:
coalesce2 <- function(...) {
Reduce(function(x, y) {
i <- which(is.na(x))
x[i] <- y[i]
x},
list(...))
}
> microbenchmark(coalesce(a,b,c),coalesce2(a,b,c))
Unit: microseconds
expr min lq median uq max neval
coalesce(a, b, c) 97.669 100.7950 102.0120 103.0505 243.438 100
coalesce2(a, b, c) 19.601 21.4055 22.8835 23.8315 45.419 100
Upvotes: 55
Reputation: 25484
I have a ready-to-use implementation called coalesce.na
in my misc package. It seems to be competitive, but not fastest.
It will also work for vectors of different length, and has a special treatment for vectors of length one:
expr min lq median uq max neval
coalesce(aa, bb, cc) 990.060402 1030.708466 1067.000698 1083.301986 1280.734389 10
coalesce1(aa, bb, cc) 11.356584 11.448455 11.804239 12.507659 14.922052 10
coalesce1a(aa, bb, cc) 2.739395 2.786594 2.852942 3.312728 5.529927 10
coalesce2(aa, bb, cc) 2.929364 3.041345 3.593424 3.868032 7.838552 10
coalesce.na(aa, bb, cc) 4.640552 4.691107 4.858385 4.973895 5.676463 10
Here's the code:
coalesce.na <- function(x, ...) {
x.len <- length(x)
ly <- list(...)
for (y in ly) {
y.len <- length(y)
if (y.len == 1) {
x[is.na(x)] <- y
} else {
if (x.len %% y.len != 0)
warning('object length is not a multiple of first object length')
pos <- which(is.na(x))
x[pos] <- y[(pos - 1) %% y.len + 1]
}
}
x
}
Of course, as Kevin pointed out, an Rcpp solution might be faster by orders of magnitude.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 46886
Looks like coalesce1 is still available
coalesce1 <- function(...) {
ans <- ..1
for (elt in list(...)[-1]) {
i <- is.na(ans)
ans[i] <- elt[i]
}
ans
}
which is faster still (but more-or-less a hand re-write of Reduce
, so less general)
> identical(coalesce(a, b, c), coalesce1(a, b, c))
[1] TRUE
> microbenchmark(coalesce(a,b,c), coalesce1(a, b, c), coalesce2(a,b,c))
Unit: microseconds
expr min lq median uq max neval
coalesce(a, b, c) 336.266 341.6385 344.7320 355.4935 538.348 100
coalesce1(a, b, c) 8.287 9.4110 10.9515 12.1295 20.940 100
coalesce2(a, b, c) 37.711 40.1615 42.0885 45.1705 67.258 100
Or for larger data compare
coalesce1a <- function(...) {
ans <- ..1
for (elt in list(...)[-1]) {
i <- which(is.na(ans))
ans[i] <- elt[i]
}
ans
}
showing that which()
can sometimes be effective, even though it implies a second pass through the index.
> aa <- sample(a, 100000, TRUE)
> bb <- sample(b, 100000, TRUE)
> cc <- sample(c, 100000, TRUE)
> microbenchmark(coalesce1(aa, bb, cc),
+ coalesce1a(aa, bb, cc),
+ coalesce2(aa,bb,cc), times=10)
Unit: milliseconds
expr min lq median uq max neval
coalesce1(aa, bb, cc) 11.110024 11.137963 11.145723 11.212907 11.270533 10
coalesce1a(aa, bb, cc) 2.906067 2.953266 2.962729 2.971761 3.452251 10
coalesce2(aa, bb, cc) 3.080842 3.115607 3.139484 3.166642 3.198977 10
Upvotes: 24