Reputation: 8125
How would one transform Future[Option[X]]
into Option[Future[X]]
?
val futOpt:Future[Option[Int]] = future(Some(1))
val optFut:Option[Future[Int]] = ?
Update:
This is a follow up to this question. I suppose I'm trying to get a grasp on elegantly transforming nested futures. I'm trying to achieve with Option
s what can be done with Seq
uences, where you turn a Future[Seq[Future[Seq[X]]]]
into Future[Future[Seq[Seq[x]]]]
and then flatMap
the double layers. As Ionut has clarified, I have phrased the question in flipped order, it was supposed to be Option[Future[X]]
-> Future[Option[X]]
.
Upvotes: 11
Views: 6226
Reputation: 572
you could technically you could do this - in snippet below I use A
context bound to a monoid so my types hold.
def fut2Opt[A: Monoid](futOpt: Future[Option[A]])(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): Option[Future[A]] =
Try(futOpt.flatMap {
case Some(a) => Future.successful(a)
case None => Future.fromTry(Try(Monoid[A].empty))
}).toOption
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 179119
Unfortunately, this isn't possible without losing the non-blocking properties of the computation. It's pretty simple if you think about it. You don't know whether the result of the computation is None
or Some
until that Future
has completed, so you have to Await
on it. At that point, it makes no sense to have a Future
anymore. You can simply return the Option[X]
, as the Future
has completed already.
Take a look here. It always returns Future.successful
, which does no computation, just wraps o
in a Future
for no good reason.
def transform[A](f: Future[Option[A]]): Option[Future[A]] =
Await.result(f, 2.seconds).map(o => Future.successful(o))
So, if in your context makes sense to block, you're better off using this:
def transform[A](f: Future[Option[A]]): Option[A] =
Await.result(f, 2.seconds)
Response for comments:
def transform[A](o: Option[Future[A]]): Future[Option[A]] =
o.map(f => f.map(Option(_))).getOrElse(Future.successful(None))
Upvotes: 32