Reputation: 3292
So here is my array.
double[] testArray = new double[10];
// will generate a random numbers from 1-20, too lazy to write the code
I want to make a search loop to check if any values are being repeated. How do I do that?
I would prefer not to use any special built-in methods since this is a small array.
Upvotes: 30
Views: 83527
Reputation: 1050
use a hashset to add members to, then check if there a previous occurrence of current member
public bool ContainsDuplicate(double[] nums)
{
int size = nums.Length;
HashSet<double> set1 = new HashSet<double>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
{
if (set1.Contains(nums[i]))
{
return true;
}
else
{
set1.Add(nums[i]);
}
}
return false;
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 1
int[] nums = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
Console.WriteLine(AnyDuplicate(nums));
}
/// <summary>
/// Returns true if there is at least a duplicate in the array.
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
static bool AnyDuplicate(int[] numbers)
{
for (int i = 0; i < numbers.Length; i++)
{
for (int j = i + 1; j < numbers.Length; j++)
{
if (numbers[i] == numbers[j])
{
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 4066
Generic extension method :
public static bool HasDuplicate<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, IEqualityComparer<T> comparer)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentException(nameof(source));
HashSet<T> set = new HashSet<T>(comparer);
foreach (var item in source)
if (!set.Add(item))
return true;
return false;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 73
We must initialize j
from i
on the first loop and add one(i+1) because we want to compare first loop value with the next value of same array.
int[] arr = new int[]{1,2,3,1,4,2,5,4};
//create one loop for arr values
for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
{
//create nested loop for compare current values with actual value of arr
for (int j = i+1; j < arr.Length; j++)
{
//and here we put our condition
if (arr[i] == arr[j])
{
Console.WriteLine(arr[i]);
}
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 787
With (OP) 10 random doubles quite fast. The chance of a repeat: ~0.000002 %.
static bool repeat(double[] a)
{
return
a[0] == a[1] || a[0] == a[2] || a[0] == a[3] || a[0] == a[4] ||
a[0] == a[5] || a[0] == a[6] || a[0] == a[7] || a[0] == a[8] ||
a[0] == a[9] || a[1] == a[2] || a[1] == a[3] || a[1] == a[4] ||
a[1] == a[5] || a[1] == a[6] || a[1] == a[7] || a[1] == a[8] ||
a[1] == a[9] || a[2] == a[3] || a[2] == a[4] || a[2] == a[5] ||
a[2] == a[6] || a[2] == a[7] || a[2] == a[8] || a[2] == a[9] ||
a[3] == a[4] || a[3] == a[5] || a[3] == a[6] || a[3] == a[7] ||
a[3] == a[8] || a[3] == a[9] || a[4] == a[5] || a[4] == a[6] ||
a[4] == a[7] || a[4] == a[8] || a[4] == a[9] || a[5] == a[6] ||
a[5] == a[7] || a[5] == a[8] || a[5] == a[9] || a[6] == a[7] ||
a[6] == a[8] || a[6] == a[9] || a[7] == a[8] || a[7] == a[9] ||
a[8] == a[9];
}
More general, with 10 numbers ~2 times slower than above,
but ~7 times faster than the hashset approach.
static bool repeat(double[] a)
{
int k = a.Length - 1;
if (k < 70)
{
double aj;
for (int i = 0, j; i < k; )
{
for (aj = a[k--], j = k; j >= i; j--)
if (aj == a[j]) return true;
for (aj = a[i++], j = i; j <= k; j++)
if (aj == a[j]) return true;
}
return false;
}
var h = new HashSet<double>();
while (k >= 0) if (!h.Add(a[k--])) return false;
return true;
}
Two lines (slow with a repeat ;)
static bool repeat(double[] a)
{ return (new HashSet<double>(a).Count < a.Length); }
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 15327
take look at my implementation its generic
and efficient
public static bool HasDuplicates<T>(IList<T> items)
{
Dictionary<T, bool> map = new Dictionary<T, bool>();
for (int i = 0; i < items.Count; i++)
{
if (map.ContainsKey(items[i]))
{
return true; // has duplicates
}
map.Add(items[i], true);
}
return false; // no duplicates
}
here are some calls
string[] strings = new[] { "1", "2", "3" };
Utility.HasDuplicates(strings)// this will return false
int[] items=new []{1,2,3,1};
Utility.HasDuplicates(items)// this will return true
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 149020
You could do this with a little Linq:
if (testArray.Length != testArray.Distinct().Count())
{
Console.WriteLine("Contains duplicates");
}
The Distinct
extension method removes any duplicates, and Count
gets the size of the result set. If they differ at all, then there are some duplicates in the list.
Alternatively, here's more complicated query, but it may be a bit more efficient:
if (testArray.GroupBy(x => x).Any(g => g.Count() > 1))
{
Console.WriteLine("Contains duplicates");
}
The GroupBy
method will group any identical elements together, and Any
return true
if any of the groups has more than one element.
Both of the above solutions work by utilizing a HashSet<T>
, but you can use one directly like this:
if (!testArray.All(new HashSet<double>().Add))
{
Console.WriteLine("Contains duplicates");
}
Or if you prefer a solution that doesn't rely on Linq at all:
var hashSet = new HashSet<double>();
foreach(var x in testArray)
{
if (!hashSet.Add(x))
{
Console.WriteLine("Contains duplicates");
break;
}
}
Upvotes: 76
Reputation: 7773
Use this:
bool CheckUniqueness(double[] values)
{
var uniqueValues = new HashSet<double>();
foreach (double d in values)
{
if(uniqueValues.Contains(d))
{
return false;
}
uniqueValues.Add(d);
}
return true;
}
Upvotes: 1