Reputation: 3277
I was looking for a concise way to iterate over two arrays. Since the arrays are not expected to be large I figured I could just concat them.
Unfortunately the Guava invocation looks horrible:
Class<? extends MyInterface>[] a2 = ...
Class<? extends MyInterface>[] a1 = ...
ObjectArrays.concat(a1, a2,
(Class<Class<? extends MyInterface>>) MyInterface.class.getClass());
Is it possible to make it more readable?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1668
Reputation: 26713
I ended up writing something of my own.
There's a main method which does all the work:
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> T[] mergeInternal(@Nonnull T[] first,
@Nonnull T[] second,
@Nullable T[] third,
@Nullable T[] fourth,
@Nullable T[] fifth,
@Nullable T[] sixth) {
int overallLength = first.length + second.length;
if (third != null) {
overallLength += third.length;
}
if (fourth != null) {
overallLength += fourth.length;
}
if (fifth != null) {
overallLength += fifth.length;
}
if (sixth != null) {
overallLength += sixth.length;
}
Object[] joinedArray = (Object[]) Array.newInstance(first.getClass().getComponentType(), overallLength);
System.arraycopy(first, 0, joinedArray, 0, first.length);
System.arraycopy(second, 0, joinedArray, first.length, second.length);
int copyTargetPosition = first.length + second.length;
if (third != null) {
System.arraycopy(third, 0, joinedArray, copyTargetPosition, third.length);
copyTargetPosition += third.length;
}
if (fourth != null) {
System.arraycopy(fourth, 0, joinedArray, copyTargetPosition, fourth.length);
copyTargetPosition += fourth.length;
}
if (fifth != null) {
System.arraycopy(fifth, 0, joinedArray, copyTargetPosition, fifth.length);
copyTargetPosition += fifth.length;
}
if (sixth != null) {
System.arraycopy(sixth, 0, joinedArray, copyTargetPosition, sixth.length);
}
return (T[]) joinedArray;
}
..and then there's an entry method for each combination of number of parameters (2..6), like so:
public static <T> T[] merge(@Nonnull T[] first, @Nonnull T[] second) {
Preconditions.checkNotNull(first);
Preconditions.checkNotNull(second);
return mergeInternal(first, second, null, null, null, null);
}
public static <T> T[] merge(@Nonnull T[] first, @Nonnull T[] second, @Nonnull T[] third)
...
public static <T> T[] merge(@Nonnull T[] first, @Nonnull T[] second, @Nonnull T[] third, @Nonnull T[] fourth)
And so on.
I think one rarely needs to merge more than 6 arrays and if you need to, you can always easily extend the given idea.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 13924
Instead of using ObjectArrays
you can combine Arrays.asList
and Iterables.concat
. This way you don't need to provide a class name.
Iterables.concat(Arrays.asList(a1), Arrays.asList(a2))
It will be a lot more readable if you use static imports:
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.concat;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
...
concat(asList(a1), asList(a2))
Upvotes: 4