Reputation: 42329
I'm looking for a way to achieve something similar to what was asked in this question R: repeat elements of a list based on another list but in python.
Basically I have three lists of the same length:
a = [0.9935,0.1955,1.3165,0.0975,0.2995,-0.0075,1.5015,1.0055,0.4525,0.2235,1.3815,0.4195,1.3685,0.0325,0.0055,0.6175,0.0615,1.8115]
b = [4.01,5.207,-0.245,5.312,0.841,1.204,-0.413,4.398,5.309,1.149, -0.295,1.903,-0.851,1.236,1.39,3.48,-0.034,4.286]
c = [0.221, 0.423, 0.125, 0.228, 0.233, 0.235, 0.244, 0.249, 0.265, 0.265, 0.268, 0.268, 0.275, 0.299, 0.301, 0.316, 0.318, 0.329]
and I want to generate new repeated items in a
and b
based on the floats stored in c
times 10 (rounded to the nearest integer). For example, the first element in a
and b
would have to be repeated 2
times because the first element in c
is 0.221
and
int(round(c[0]*10.),0) = 2
So the first two elements in the new a_2
and b_2
lists would look like:
a_2 = [0.9935, 0.9935, ...]
b_2 = [4.01, 4.01, ...]
Applying this to the first three items in a
and b
would result in:
a_2 = [0.9935, 0.9935, 0.1955, 0.1955, 0.1955, 0.1955, 1.3165, ...]
b_2 = [4.01, 4.01, 5.207, 5.207, 5.207, 5.207, -0.245, ...]
since c[1]=0.423
and c[2]=0.125
which means the second and third items in a
and b
need to be repeated 4
and 1
times respectively.
For the sake of completeness I'll mention that this question is related to the answer given in this other question How to obtain a weighted gaussian filter. So this is an integral part of what makes the answer to that other question work.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 251
Reputation: 142136
You can use chain
, izip
and repeat
:
from itertools import chain, repeat, izip
new_a = list(chain.from_iterable(repeat(el, int(round(n * 10))) for el, n in izip(a, c)))
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1121724
You would use zip()
to combine a
and c
, and b
and c
, together with itertools.chain.from_iterable()
to generate new sequences:
from itertools import chain
a_2 = list(chain.from_iterable([i] * int(round(j * 10)) for i, j in zip(a, c)))
b_2 = list(chain.from_iterable([i] * int(round(j * 10)) for i, j in zip(b, c)))
Demo:
>>> from itertools import chain
>>> a = [0.9935,0.1955,1.3165,0.0975,0.2995,-0.0075,1.5015,1.0055,0.4525,0.2235,1.3815,0.4195,1.3685,0.0325,0.0055,0.6175,0.0615,1.8115]
>>> b = [4.01,5.207,-0.245,5.312,0.841,1.204,-0.413,4.398,5.309,1.149, -0.295,1.903,-0.851,1.236,1.39,3.48,-0.034,4.286]
>>> c = [0.221, 0.423, 0.125, 0.228, 0.233, 0.235, 0.244, 0.249, 0.265, 0.265, 0.268, 0.268, 0.275, 0.299, 0.301, 0.316, 0.318, 0.329]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable([i] * int(round(j * 10)) for i, j in zip(a, c)))
[0.9935, 0.9935, 0.1955, 0.1955, 0.1955, 0.1955, 1.3165, 0.0975, 0.0975, 0.2995, 0.2995, -0.0075, -0.0075, 1.5015, 1.5015, 1.0055, 1.0055, 0.4525, 0.4525, 0.4525, 0.2235, 0.2235, 0.2235, 1.3815, 1.3815, 1.3815, 0.4195, 0.4195, 0.4195, 1.3685, 1.3685, 1.3685, 0.0325, 0.0325, 0.0325, 0.0055, 0.0055, 0.0055, 0.6175, 0.6175, 0.6175, 0.0615, 0.0615, 0.0615, 1.8115, 1.8115, 1.8115]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable([i] * int(round(j * 10)) for i, j in zip(b, c)))
[4.01, 4.01, 5.207, 5.207, 5.207, 5.207, -0.245, 5.312, 5.312, 0.841, 0.841, 1.204, 1.204, -0.413, -0.413, 4.398, 4.398, 5.309, 5.309, 5.309, 1.149, 1.149, 1.149, -0.295, -0.295, -0.295, 1.903, 1.903, 1.903, -0.851, -0.851, -0.851, 1.236, 1.236, 1.236, 1.39, 1.39, 1.39, 3.48, 3.48, 3.48, -0.034, -0.034, -0.034, 4.286, 4.286, 4.286]
If a
, b
and c
are particularly large, or if for certain values of c
times 10 lead to a lot of repetitions and you only need to process these values one by one (e.g. you don't need to materialize the whole a_2
and b_2
lists in memory), you could use more itertools
functions here:
from itertools import chain, repeat, izip
a_2_generator = chain.from_iterable(repeat(i, int(round(j * 10))) for i, j in izip(a, c))
b_2_generator = chain.from_iterable(repeat(i, int(round(j * 10))) for i, j in izip(b, c))
Note the lack of list()
here; now each stage is handled by iterators producing only enough to satisfy one step at a time, saving on memory.
Use this if you need if you only need to iterate over the output once; if your plot library takes a general iterable for plotting these should work just fine.
Upvotes: 1