Reputation: 5377
I have problem with implementing recursive template (function in template struct), which will be terminated by std::tuple_size.
Here is fragment of code (I simplified code, to emphasize problem):
template<int index, typename ...T_arguments>
struct Helper
{
static void func (size_t& return_size,
const std::tuple<T_arguments...>& arguments)
{
const auto& argument (std::get<index> (arguments));
return_size += ::value_size (argument);
::Helper<index + 1, T_arguments...>::func (return_size, arguments);
}
// ...
template<typename... T_arguments>
struct Helper<std::tuple_size<T_arguments...>::value, T_arguments...>
{
static void func (size_t& return_size,
const std::tuple<T_arguments...>& arguments)
{
const auto& argument (std::get<std::tuple_size<T_arguments...>::value> (arguments));
return_size += ::value_size (argument);
}
Initial template call looks like this:
Helper<0, T_arguments...>::func (return_size, arguments);
GCC fails with error:
error: template argument ‘std::tuple_size::value’ involves template parameter(s) struct Helper::value, T_arguments...>
std::tuple_size
is claimed to be known at compile time, so why I cannot use it template specialization?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 662
Reputation: 1604
Use index_sequence and range-based-for.
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstddef>
#include <tuple>
namespace mpl
{
template< std::size_t ... I>
struct index_sequence
{
};
template< std::size_t s, typename I1, typename I2>
struct concate;
template< std::size_t s, std::size_t ...I, std::size_t ...J>
struct concate<s, index_sequence<I...>, index_sequence<J...> >
{
typedef index_sequence<I... ,( J + s)... > type;
};
template< std::size_t N>
struct make_index_sequence
{
typedef typename concate< N/2,
typename make_index_sequence< N/2>::type,
typename make_index_sequence< N - N/2>::type
>::type type;
};
template<>struct make_index_sequence<0>
{
typedef index_sequence<> type;
};
template<> struct make_index_sequence<1>
{
typedef index_sequence<0> type;
};
template< typename ...T>
struct index_sequence_for
{
typedef typename make_index_sequence< sizeof...(T) > ::type type;
};
} // mpl
template< typename T >
std::size_t value_size( T ){ return sizeof(T); }// only for illustration
template< typename ...Tp, std::size_t ...i>
std::size_t total_value_size_impl( const std::tuple<Tp...> & t, mpl::index_sequence<i...> )
{
std::size_t result=0;
for(auto x: { value_size( std::get<i>(t) ) ... } )
{
result += x;
}
return result;
}
template< typename ...Tp>
std::size_t total_value_size( const std::tuple<Tp...> & t)
{
typedef typename mpl::index_sequence_for<Tp...> :: type indexes;
return total_value_size_impl( t, indexes{} );
}
#include <cstdio>
int main()
{
typedef std::tuple<int, char, double> types;
std::size_t result = total_value_size(types{});
printf("%d\n", result);
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 217265
Actually what you're doing is forbidden by section §14.5.4/9 which says,
A partially specialized non-type argument expression shall not involve a template parameter of the partial specialization except when the argument expression is a simple identifier.
Following may help:
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I == sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
total_value_size(size_t& return_size, const std::tuple<Tp...>& t)
{ }
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename... Tp>
inline typename std::enable_if<I < sizeof...(Tp), void>::type
total_value_size(size_t& return_size, const std::tuple<Tp...>& t)
{
const auto& argument (std::get<I> (t));
return_size += ::value_size(argument);
total_value_size<I + 1, Tp...>(return_size, t);
}
Upvotes: 1