Reputation: 105439
I'm implementing this approach to send updates to my website:
created bare repository to push to
$ mkdir website.git && cd website.git
$ git init --bare
And added the following hook:
$ mkdir /var/www/example.com
$ cat > hooks/post-receive
#!/bin/sh
GIT_WORK_TREE=/var/www/example.com git checkout -f
$ chmod +x hooks/post-receive
when I push to website.git from local repository, the update works fine. But no files are added into /var/www/example.com
. How can I investigate what could be wrong here? Any kind of log or something?
EDIT ----------------------
The problem is fixed if I push to master
branch on repoRemote
, not demo
. Why is so?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 662
Reputation: 5249
From comments above about reliability of targeting specific branches - I found this gist which targets the master branch from post-receive hook.
#!/bin/bash
set -eu
TARGET="/deployment-location-here"
GIT_DIR="/trigger-location-here"
BRANCH="master"
while read oldrev newrev ref
do
# only checking out the master (or whatever branch you would like to deploy)
if [[ $ref = refs/heads/"$BRANCH" ]];
then
echo "Ref $ref received. Deploying ${BRANCH} branch to production..."
git --work-tree="$TARGET" --git-dir="$GIT_DIR" checkout -f
else
echo "Ref $ref received. Doing nothing: only the ${BRANCH} branch may be deployed on this server."
fi
done
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1323115
Another possible cause for post-receive hook trouble is identified and fixed in Git 2.13 (Q2 2017): if the GIT_WORK_TREE
is set to an invalid path.
See commit ce83ead, commit aac3eaa (08 Mar 2017) by Johannes Schindelin (dscho
).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster
-- in commit ba37c92, 13 Mar 2017)
Example (which would crash with Git 2.12 only)
GIT_WORK_TREE=/.invalid/work/tree &&
export GIT_WORK_TREE &&
git rev-parse
# dies with error code 128
The bug was introduced in Git 2.12.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 487725
Edit, Dec 2016: people are still finding this old answer, and now, 3 years later, I truly understand what the real issue is. The problem occurs when you use a post-receive hook to deploy multiple different branches. If you only ever deploy one branch from a bare repository, you will have fewer problems. Git keeps evolving and the "best" solution for automatic deployment of several branches may vary depending on which Git version you have. See also Git post-receive deployment stops working at random points.
(Original answer below line.)
I've found that git checkout -f
always needs a branch name; allowing it to use HEAD
in bare repositories is not very predictable.
You may also run into issues with the index (git will write one in the bare repo, but it gets confused at times). It works best to git checkout -f deployment-branch
into a new, fresh, empty directory. (It should work to set an index file per deployment-branch, I've just never gotten around to experimenting with this.)
If your bare repo will be fairly active on other branches than the one(s) used for deployment, it's a good idea to wrap the code with fancier shell-scripting that checks whether the deployment branch in question has actually been changed. That is, if someone updates web-devel
, there's no point re-re-re-deploying deployment-branch
, which they did not update this time.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 7803
cd .git/hooks
mv post-receive post-receive-inner
now create a new post-receive
:
#!/bin/bash
set -x
./post-receive-inner "$@" 1>/tmp/git.log 2>&1
Make this executable and try again, the results should end up in /tmp/git.log
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1029
I do this on my sites:
#!/bin/sh
unset $(git rev-parse --local-env-vars)
cd /var/www/example.com
git pull
Upvotes: 0