Reputation: 3583
What are the syntax differences between the NASM and MASM assemblers?
Upvotes: 56
Views: 45323
Reputation: 993065
Section 2.2 of the NASM documentation is titled Quick Start for MASM Users which lists the important differences between NASM and MASM.
NASM version 2.15 added some MASM compatibility, including a %use masm
macro package. See section 6.5 masm
: MASM compatibility. Even without the macro package, ?
and DUP
work in data directives like db
, and displacement[base+index]
is allowed instead of the usual [rdi+4]
syntax which NASM used to require.
Also related, How to know if an assembly code has particular syntax (emu8086, NASM, TASM, ...)? discusses some of the syntax differences.
Upvotes: 57
Reputation: 157
What an interesting question. The difference between them is, they are not compatible! But then again, nasm assemblers are not compatible amongst themselves, it seems. Learned it the hard way, while compiling libvpx. I think this single example says it all:
ml64.exe (MSVC 2019) -> throws
nasm for windows -> compiles some *.asm files, throws on some
invalid combination of opcode and operands
Huh?
yasm for windows -> works
llvm assembler (debian) -> throws:
/usr/lib/llvm-13/bin/llvm-as
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/llvm-13
yasm (debian) -> works
nasm (debian) -> works
GNU assembler -> ???
https://manpages.debian.org/experimental/binutils-common/as.1.en.html
Upvotes: -3