Reputation: 135285
After some find and replace refactoring I ended up with this gem:
const class A
{
};
What does "const class" mean? It seems to compile ok.
Upvotes: 43
Views: 37447
Reputation: 113
Try compiling it with GCC, it will give you below error:
error: qualifiers can only be specified for objects and functions.
As you can see from the error that only objects(variables, pointers, class objects etc.) and functions can be constant. So try making the object as constant, then it should compile fine.
const class A {};
const A a ;
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 118500
It's meaningless unless you declare an instance of the class afterward, such as this example:
const // It is a const object...
class nullptr_t
{
public:
template<class T>
operator T*() const // convertible to any type of null non-member pointer...
{ return 0; }
template<class C, class T>
operator T C::*() const // or any type of null member pointer...
{ return 0; }
private:
void operator&() const; // Can't take address of nullptr
} nullptr = {};
An interim nullptr
implementation if you're waiting for C++0x.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation:
What does "const class" mean? It seems to compile ok.
Not for me it doesn't. I think your compiler's just being polite and ignoring it.
Edit: Yep, VC++ silently ignores the const, GCC complains.
Upvotes: 37
Reputation: 400274
The const
is meaningless in that example, and your compiler should give you an error, but if you use it to declare variables of that class between the closing }
and the ;
, then that defines those instances as const
, e.g.:
const class A
{
public:
int x, y;
} anInstance = {3, 4};
// The above is equivalent to:
const A anInstance = {3, 4};
Upvotes: 55
Reputation: 90422
If you had this:
const class A
{
} a;
Then it would clearly mean that 'a' is const. Otherwise, I think that it is likely invalid c++.
Upvotes: 22