CODEWITHSUNDEEP
openglmatrixprojection-matrix
Chad Mourning
Chad Mourning

Reputation: 619

Proper calculation for the first element of an OpenGL projection Matrix?

Almost all the theoretical stuff I read about projection matrices have the first element being 2n/(r-l), but most of the open source implementations I've seen have it as 2n/((t-b)*a), -- which makes sense to me at first since (r-l) should be ((t-b)*a), but when I actually run the numbers, something feels off.

If we have a vertical field of view of 65 degrees, a near plane of .1, and an aspect ratio of 4:3, then I seem to get:

2n/(r-l) = .2 / (tan(65*(4/3)*.5) * .2) = 1.0599

but

2n((t-b)*a) = .2 / (tan(65*.5) * (4/3) * .2) = 1.1773

Why is there a difference between everything I read, and everything I see implemented? I didn't notice until I started implementing the same analytical inverse I see whose first element is (r-l)/2n, which isn't the inverse of these other implementations.

Upvotes: 0

Views: 77

Answers (1)

derhass
derhass

Reputation: 45332

You can't multiply the aspect ratio into the angle. The tangens isn't a linear function. Having 65 degress vertical field of view does not mean that you're going to have 86,67 degrees horizontal FOV with 4:3 aspect, but ~80.69 degrees.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions