Reputation: 10543
A recently asked question has lead me to believe the syntactic sugar for *
by Rcpp
does not work as intended. In the linked question, the user is trying to multiply a matrix by a scalar.
R code
Here's what we're trying to achieve in Rcpp
, but for now in plain R
:
> m <- matrix(0:3, 2, 2)
> m * 3
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 0 6
[2,] 3 9
Rcpp Code
I've created some minimal examples demonstrating both the problem above, and also some unexpected behaviour along the way. First note that I'm consistently using List
as a return type, because it removes the need for me to declare the appropriate type in advance:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List FooMat() {
// Create a fill a 2x2 matrix
NumericMatrix tmp(2,2);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
tmp[i] = i;
}
return List::create(tmp);
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List FooMat2() {
// Create a fill a 2x2 matrix
NumericMatrix tmp(2,2);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
tmp[i] = i;
}
NumericVector x(1);
x[1] = 3;
return List::create(tmp * x);
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List FooMat3() {
// Create a fill a 2x2 matrix
NumericMatrix tmp(2,2);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
tmp[i] = i;
}
NumericVector x(1);
x[1] = 3;
return List::create(tmp * x[1]);
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List FooMat4() {
// Create a fill a 2x2 matrix
NumericMatrix tmp(2,2);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
tmp[i] = i;
}
return List::create(tmp * 3);
}
Now if we source the file we get some odd behaviour:
# Proof that we can return a NumericMatrix in a List:
> FooMat()
[[1]]
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 0 2
[2,] 1 3
# Multiply the whole NumericMatrix by a whole NumericVector
# whose size is 1. Unsafe behaviour?
> FooMat2()
[[1]]
[1] 0.000000e+00 3.000000e+00 1.388988e-309 2.083483e-309
# Multiply the whole NumericMatrix by the first element of
# The NumericVector. Results are correct, but `*` converts
# the answer to a NumericVector instead of a NumericMatrix
> FooMat3()
[[1]]
[1] 0 3 6 9
# Same as FooMat3() except now we just multiply the NumericMatrix
# by an integer
> FooMat4()
[[1]]
[1] 0 3 6 9
One, the syntactic sugar for *
provided by Rcpp
does not seem to correctly handle multiplication of Matrices with scalars. Two, multiplying by a whole NumericVector
, as in FooMat2()
leads to unsafe behaviour.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 379
Reputation: 368599
As I stated in previous answers, when I need to do actual math on matrices, I use Armadillo objects:
R> cppFunction('arma::mat scott(arma::mat x, double z) {
+ return(x*z); }',
+ depends="RcppArmadillo")
R> scott(matrix(1:4,2), 2)
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 2 6
[2,] 4 8
R>
Sugar operations are nice, but not complete. We will certainly take patches, though.
And as we said a few times before: rcpp-devel is the proper support channel.
Edit (Oct 2016 or 2 1/2 years later): Searching for something else just got me back here. In the Rcpp 0.12.* series, some work when into operations between matrix and vector so the basic 'matrix times scalar' now works as you'd expect:
R> cppFunction("NumericMatrix testmat(NumericMatrix m, double multme) {
+ NumericMatrix n = m * multme;
+ return n; }")
R> testmat(matrix(1:4,2), 1)
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 1 3
[2,] 2 4
R> testmat(matrix(1:4,2), 3)
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 3 9
[2,] 6 12
R>
I'd probably still use RcppArmadillo for math on matrices though.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 17642
This is an unfortunate consequence of a bad design decision, namely making Rcpp matrices derive from Rcpp vectors.
I'm likely to revert this decision in Rcpp implementations I now maintain: Rcpp11 and Rcpp98. I don't think anymore that there any benefit of having Matrix derive from Vector and it gets in the way of CRTP that is used at the end of this file.
Upvotes: 2