Reputation: 213
My programs looks like below
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
class A {
public:
void foo(int n ) { std::cout << n << std::endl; }
};
int main()
{
A a;
std::thread t1(&A::foo, std::ref(a), 100);
t1.join();
return 0;
}
When I compile it using the following command I get errors
g++ -o main main.cc -lpthread -std=c++11
Error:
In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/4.8.2/thread:39:0,
from check.cc:2:
/usr/local/include/c++/4.8.2/functional: In instantiation of ‘struct std::_Bind_simple<std::_Mem_fn<void (A::*)(int)>(std::reference_wrapper<A>, int)>’:
/usr/local/include/c++/4.8.2/thread:137:47: required from ‘std::thread::thread(_Callable&&, _Args&& ...) [with _Callable = void (A::*)(int); _Args = {std::reference_wrapper<A>, int}]’
check.cc:13:42: required from here
/usr/local/include/c++/4.8.2/functional:1697:61: error:no type named ‘type’ in ‘class std::result_of<std::_Mem_fn<void (A::*)(int)>(std::reference_wrapper<A>, int)>’
typedef typename result_of<_Callable(_Args...)>::type result_type;
^
/usr/local/include/c++/4.8.2/functional:1727:9: error:no type named ‘type’ in ‘class std::result_of<std::_Mem_fn<void (A::*)(int)>(std::reference_wrapper<A>, int)>’
_M_invoke(_Index_tuple<_Indices...>)
^
Upvotes: 21
Views: 19922
Reputation: 480
Ok the problem is ref(obj) returns a reference (alias) to an object not a pointer(address)! to work with threads we need pointers not references! See Below a handy program to use function pointers with threads:
#include <iostream>
#include "vector"
#include "string"
#include "thread"
#include "atomic"
#include "functional"
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "stdio.h"
#include "string.h"
#include "assert.h"
using namespace std;
//__________________________Global variables_________________________________________________
atomic<int> var(0);
//__________________________class____________________________________________________________
class C
{
public:
C()
{}
static void addition (int a, int b)
{
for(int i= 0; i< a+b; i++)
var++;
}
void subtraction (int a, int b)
{
for(int i= 0; i< a+b; i++)
var--;
}
};
class D : std::atomic<int>
{
public:
D() : std::atomic<int>(0)
{}
void increase_member (int n)
{
for (int i=0; i<n; ++i)
fetch_add(1);
}
int get_atomic_val()
{
return this->load();
}
};
//________________________________functions________________________________________________
void non_member_add (int a, int b)
{
for(int i= 0; i< a+b; i++)
var++;
}
//__________________________________main____________________________________________________
int main ()
{
int a=1, b=5;
// (I)...........................................static public member function (with no inheritance).........................................
void (* add_member_func_ptr)(int,int) = C::addition; // pointer to a static public member function
//defining thread pool for ststic public member_add_ptr
vector<thread> thread_pool;
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(add_member_func_ptr,a,b));
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"static public member function (with no inheritance)\t"<<var<<endl;
//defining thread pool for ststic public member function
var=0;
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(C::addition,a,b)); //void (* add_member_func_ptr)(int,int) is equal to C::addition
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"static public member function (with no inheritance)\t"<<var<<endl;
// (II)..............................................non-static public member function (with no inheritance)...................................
C bar;
void (C::* sub_member_func_ptr)(int,int) = & C::subtraction; // pointer to a non-static public member function
var=0;
//defining thread pool for non-ststic public member function
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(sub_member_func_ptr,bar,a,b));
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"non-static public member function (with no inheritance)\t"<<var<<endl;
var=0;
//defining thread pool for non-ststic public member function
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(&C::subtraction,bar,a,b)); //void (C::* sub_member_func_ptr)(int,int) equals & C::subtraction;
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"non-static public member function (with no inheritance)\t"<<var<<endl;
// (III)................................................non-member function .................................................
void (* non_member_add_ptr)(int,int) = non_member_add; //pointer to a non-member function
var=0;
//defining thread pool for non_member_add
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(non_member_add,a,b));
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"non-member function\t"<<var<<endl<<endl;
// (IV)...........................................non-static public member function (with inheritance).........................
D foo;
void (D::* member_func_ptr) (int) = & D::increase_member; //pointer to a non-static public member function of a derived class
//defining thread pool for non-ststic public member function of a derived class
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
thread_pool.push_back(thread(member_func_ptr,&foo,10)); //use &foo because this is derived class!
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"non-static public member function (with inheritance)\t"<<foo.get_atomic_val()<<endl;
//defining thread pool for non-ststic public member function
D poo;
thread_pool.clear();
for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
{
reference_wrapper<D> poo_ref= ref(poo);
D& poo_ref_= poo_ref.get(); //ref(obj) returns a reference (alias) to an object not a pointer(address)!
D* d_ptr= &poo; //to work with thread we need pointers not references!
thread_pool.push_back(thread(&D::increase_member, d_ptr,10)); //void (D::* member_func_ptr) (int) equals & D::increase_member;
}
for(thread& thr: thread_pool)
thr.join();
cout<<"non-static public member function (with inheritance)\t"<<poo.get_atomic_val()<<endl<<endl;
return 0;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 763
Just wanted to add that i got the same error just by giving incompatible arguments to std::bind/std::thread. Like giving a pointer to a base class when a more specific pointer was in the signature of the actual function.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 171303
GCC 4.8 is correct, std::thread
and other components defined in terms of INVOKE must not be implemented in terms of std::bind
. They must not invoke nested bind expressions and must use perfect forwarding for bound arguments (rather than forwarding them as lvalues as std::bind
does), and additionally as you discovered they do not unwrap reference_wrapper
objects. In GCC 4.8 I introduced an internal implementation detail, __bind_simple
, for use by std::thread
etc. that doesn't have the full std::bind
behaviour.
While the other differences from std::bind
are desirable, I think the INVOKE operation should still support reference_wrapper
objects, so I filed a defect report, see LWG 2219.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 1432
Regarding your question title I would use a lambda for thread construction. With or without references, via calling member functions or binding parameters.
std::thread t1([&] { a.foo(100); });
Upvotes: 11
Reputation: 42554
EDIT: RETRACTION
Kerrek is correct here: I erroneously assumed that the std::thread
constructor and std::bind
were by design identical interfaces. However, the automatic conversion of arguments from reference_wrapper<A>
to A&
is specified for only std::bind
in [func.bind.bind]/10:
The values of the bound arguments
v1, v2, ..., vN
and their corresponding typesV1, V2, ..., VN
depend on the typesTiD
derived from the call tobind
and the cv-qualifiers cv of the call wrapperg
as follows:
- if
TiD
isreference_wrapper<T>
, the argument istid.get()
and its typeVi
isT&
;- ...
So this particular use of reference_wrapper<A>
is not supported by std::thread
, but is supported by std::bind
. The fact that std::thread
behaves identically to std::bind
in this instance in other/older compilers is the bug, not the behavior of 4.8 line GCC releases.
I'll leave the incorrect answer here with this explanation in hopes that others won't make this same mistake in the future.
Short (but INCORRECT) answer
This is apparently a bug in the standard library included with GCC 4.8. The code is correctly compiled by:
Long (and also INCORRECT) answer:
The effects of the std::thread
constructor
template <class F, class ...Args>
explicit thread(F&& f, Args&&... args);
are detailed in C++11 30.3.1.2 [thread.thread.constr]/4:
The new thread of execution executes
INVOKE(DECAY_COPY(std::forward<F>(f)), DECAY_COPY(std::forward<Args>(args))...)
with the calls to
DECAY_COPY
being evaluated in the constructing thread.
DECAY_COPY
is described in 30.2.6 [thread.decaycopy]/1:
In several places in this Clause the operation
DECAY_COPY(x)
is used. All such uses mean call the functiondecay_copy(x)
and use the result, wheredecay_copy
is defined as follows:template <class T> typename decay<T>::type decay_copy(T&& v) { return std::forward<T>(v); }
In the invocation in the OP std::thread t1(&A::foo, std::ref(a), 100);
all three arguments are rvalues that DECAY_COPY
will replicate into objects in the new thread's environment before the invocation, whose effect is described in 20.8.2 [func.require]/1:
Define
INVOKE(f, t1, t2, ..., tN)
as follows:
(t1.*f)(t2, ..., tN)
whenf
is a pointer to a member function of a classT
andt1
is an object of typeT
or a reference to an object of typeT
or a reference to an object of a type derived fromT
;((*t1).*f)(t2, ..., tN)
whenf
is a pointer to a member function of a classT
andt1
is not one of the types described in the previous item;- ...
For the code in the OP, f
is a pointer to member function of class A
with value &A::foo
, t1
is an lvalue reference_wrapper<A>
whose stored reference refers to a
, and t2
is an int
with value 100
. The second bullet of 20.8.2/1 applies. Since t1
is a reference_wrapper
, *t1
evaluates to the stored reference (per 20.8.3.3/1) and the invocation in the new thread is effectively
(a.*&A::foo)(100);
So yes, the standard describes the behavior of the OP exactly as expected.
EDIT: Oddly, GCC 4.8 correctly compiles the very similar example:
class A {
public:
void foo(int n) { std::cout << n << std::endl; }
};
int main()
{
A a;
auto foo = std::bind(&A::foo, std::ref(a), 100);
foo();
}
Upvotes: 11
Reputation: 477060
This isn't the right place for a reference wrapper. A simple pointer suffices, though, and achieves the desired result:
std::thread t1(&A::foo, &a, 100);
Upvotes: 25