CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++templatesexplicit
didinino
didinino

Reputation: 113

using explicit with templates, C++

i have a question about explicit and templates:

template<class T> 
class A {

    class A_Impl {
        T var;

        public:
            explicit A_Impl(T var1) : var(var1), version(1) 
            {
            }

            A_Impl(const A_Impl& a ) : var(a.var), version(1) 
            {
            }

            const A_Impl& operator=(const A_Impl& a)
            {
                var=a.var;++version;return *this;   
            }

            operator T() const { return var; }

            friend class A<T>;
    };

    A_Impl a;

public:
    A(T var): a(var) 
    {
    }

    A_Impl& get() { return a; }
};

void main() {
    A<int> a1(5);
    cout<<"a1 = "<<a1.get()<<endl;

    a1.get()=7;
    cout<<"a1 = "<<a1.get()<<endl;

    a1=13;
    cout<<"a1 = "<<a1.get()<<endl;
}

I get en error at a1.get()=7; which says no operator "=" matches these operands

Also, if i take explicit word out it will compile, but i dont understand the difference between the a1.get() function and a1=13; which works fine even with explicit.

Upvotes: 0

Views: 95

Answers (2)

Shoe
Shoe

Reputation: 76280

I get en error at a1.get()=7; which says no operator "=" matches these operands

There's no way to convert 7 to a A_Impl for operator=, because the constructor A_Impl(T), which in this instance is expanded to A_Impl(int), is declared explicit.

You can either remove the explicit keyword, or explicitly create an A_Impl with:

a1.get() = A_Impl(7);

Alternatively you can also declare a specific operator=:

const A_Impl& operator=(const T&)

for the A_Impl class.

Also, if i take explicit word out it will compile, but i dont understand the difference between the a1.get() function and a1=13; which works fine even with explicit.

a1 = 13 works fine because the template class A has a non-explicit constructor to T (specifically A(T var)), which, in this case, match perfect for T = int.

Also notice that main should always return int, not void.

Upvotes: 1

Sebastian Hoffmann
Sebastian Hoffmann

Reputation: 11502

You only have declared a copy assignment operator: const A_Impl& operator=(const A_Impl& a), but not a assignment operator for T types: const A_Impl& operator=(const T& a).

If you dont have an explicit constructor, your int (7) will implecitely converted to a A_Impl object which is then assigned to your returned reference.

If your constructor is explicit this implecit conversion is not possible anymore (thats what explicit actually does), and thus there is no possibility to assign an int to a A_Impl. What however would work if your A_Impl class is public, is this (the same that happens under the hood if you dont write explicit):

a1.get() = A_Impl(7);

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions