Reputation: 5153
Is there a way to generate a macro which yields the max size of a list of data types?
Goal
typedef struct {
uint8_t x;
} A;
typedef struct {
uint16_t x;
} B;
typedef struct {
uint8_t x[10];
} C;
#define sizeof_max(A,B,C) //compiles to '10'
Use Case
Different value-mappings for a common data-segment.
typedef union {
uint8_t array[sizeof_max(A,B,C)];
A iso_hugenum_a;
B ext_a0;
C ext_a1; //and someday down the road 'D' may also get added
} DATA_SEG;
This is for an embedded application where the device implements a base protocol ISO_HUGENUM_A. The device must also support extensions to this protocol EXT_A0, EXT_A1, EXT_B0. Heck, in this case there is a real chance of EXT_C0 showing up down the road (yuck)!
Notes
The primary goal here is for a top-level system to know the data-segment's size in an extensible and safe way. It is tempting to just say 'cast as array' when you need as array. But
At the system-level (who doesn't give an eff about the protocol) there are read, write and checks (e.g. crc) to this data segment
2yrs down the road 'EXT_C0' may come along. I want to leave the poor soul who inherits my code with something that won't break when EXT_C0 grows the data segment
I am hoping there is a solution, but have not found one yet. Any ideas? All the sizes would be generated by the pre-processor, so it seems like an ideal candidate for a macro.
-Justin
Upvotes: 4
Views: 1242
Reputation: 93524
The following macro definition does precisely what you have asked:
#define sizeof_max(s1,s2,s3) sizeof( union{s1 a; s2 b; s3 c; })
For your example structures the following:
size_t s = sizeof_max( A,B,C ) ;
results in s
= 10.
Of course you could omit the array member and simply cast a DATA_SEG
object address to a uint8_t*
when you want to access as a byte array:
DATA_SEG x ;
uint8_t* array = (uint8_t*)&x ;
That would allow DATA_SEG
to add more structures if necessary without having to change the macro - a lot safer and more maintainable.
Added:
Another possibility is to separate the specialised interpretations from the byte overlay thus:
typedef union
{
A iso_hugenum_a;
B ext_a0;
C ext_a1;
D added_someday ;
} DATA_SEG_U;
typedef union
{
uint8_t array[sizeof(DATA_SEG_U)];
DATA_SEG_U data_seg ;
} DATA_SEG ;
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 5153
Combining variadic macros with multi-level pre-processing can work -
This achieves the desired goal 'for up to 5 inputs'.
#define VA_NUM_ARGS_IMPL(_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,N,...) N
#define VA_NUM_ARGS(...) VA_NUM_ARGS_IMPL(__VA_ARGS__, 5,4,3,2,1)
#define macro_dispatcher__(func,nargs) func ## nargs
#define macro_dispatcher_(func, nargs) macro_dispatcher__(func, nargs)
#define macro_dispatcher(func, ...) macro_dispatcher_(func, VA_NUM_ARGS(__VA_ARGS__))
#define sizeof_max(...) macro_dispatcher(sizeof_max, __VA_ARGS__)(__VA_ARGS__)
#define sizeof_max1(a) (sizeof(a))
#define sizeof_max2(a,b) (sizeof(a)>sizeof(b)?sizeof(a):sizeof(b))
#define sizeof_max3(a,b,c) sizeof_max2(sizeof_max2(a,b), c)
#define sizeof_max4(a,b,c,d) sizeof_max2(sizeof_max3(a,b,c),d)
#define sizeof_max5(a,b,c,d,e) sizeof_max2(sizeof_max4(a,b,c,d),e)
This will work for GCC/C99. It is 'a' solution to the problem, and I post here because I learned much from it, and want to share it. That being said, read the disclaimer at end:).
References
The use of macro_dispatcher() was provided by 'rmn' from the efesx forum here:
Adding fcn# to the function name also described here:
Of course, here are some GCC variadic macro pages:
Example
typedef union {
uint8_t array[sizeof_max(A,B,C)]; //array is of size 10.
A iso_hugenum_a;
B ext_a0;
C ext_a1;
} DATA_SEG;
Breakdown
you can try this code in 'main.c' and compile with 'gcc -E main.c' to observe the macro-ness:
int main (void) {
uint8_t rslt;
//preprocs to 'rslt=C;'
rslt = VA_NUM_ARGS_IMPL(A,B,C,A,B,C,A);
//preprocs to 'rslt=3'
rslt = VA_NUM_ARGS(A,B,C);
//preprocs to 'rslt=maxN'
rslt = macro_dispatcher__(max, N);
//preprocs to 'rslt=macro_dispatcher_(max, N);'
rslt = macro_dispacther_(max, N);
//preprocs to 'rslt=max3;'
rslt = macro_dispatcher(max, X, Y, Z);
//preprocs to 'sizeof_max1(A)/max2(A,B)/max3(A,B,C)'
rslt = sizeof_max(A);
rslt = sizeof_max(A,B);
rslt = sizeof_max(A,B,C);
//Breakdown:
//sizeof_max(A,B,C);
//macro_dispatcher(sizeof_max, __VA_ARGS__)(__VA_ARGS__)
//macro_dispatcher_(sizeof_max, 3)(__VA_ARGS__)
//macro_dispatcher__(sizeof_max,3)(__VA_ARGS__)
//
//Result:
//sizeof_max3(__VA_ARGS__)
//sizeof_max3(A,B,C)
rslt = sizeof_max(A,B,C);
return 0;
}
(Disclaimer) Simpler & Safer always wins. As such I will most likely go with something closest to Clifford's answer. No need for me to play cute tricks that will 'byte' someone else down the road.
Upvotes: 1