CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#linq
JarrettV
JarrettV

Reputation: 18955

Fluent and Query Expression — Is there any benefit(s) of one over other?

LINQ is one of the greatest improvements to .NET since generics and it saves me tons of time, and lines of code. However, the fluent syntax seems to come much more natural to me than the query expression syntax.

var title = entries.Where(e => e.Approved)
    .OrderBy(e => e.Rating).Select(e => e.Title)
    .FirstOrDefault();

var query = (from e in entries
             where e.Approved
             orderby e.Rating
             select e.Title).FirstOrDefault();

Is there any difference between the two or is there any particular benefit of one over other?

Upvotes: 267

Views: 79341

Answers (14)

Elchanan Razin
Elchanan Razin

Reputation: 93

From Microsoft's docs:

As a rule when you write LINQ queries, we recommend that you use query syntax whenever possible and method syntax whenever necessary. There is no semantic or performance difference between the two different forms. Query expressions are often more readable than equivalent expressions written in method syntax.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/concepts/linq/#query-expression-overview

They also say:

To get started using LINQ, you do not have to use lambdas extensively. However, certain queries can only be expressed in method syntax and some of those require lambda expressions.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/concepts/linq/query-syntax-and-method-syntax-in-linq

Upvotes: 3

Antony Scott
Antony Scott

Reputation: 21998

I've been using Linq for about 6 months now. When I first started using it I preferred the query syntax as it's very similar to T-SQL.

But, I'm gradually coming round to the former now, as it's easy to write reusable chunks of code as extension methods and just chain them together. Although I do find putting each clause on its own line helps a lot with readability.

Upvotes: 4

Tim Schmelter
Tim Schmelter

Reputation: 460108

In VB.NET i very much prefer query syntax.

I hate to repeat the ugly Function-keyword: 

Dim fullNames = { "Anne Williams", "John Fred Smith", "Sue Green" };
Dim query =
     fullNames.SelectMany(Function(fName) fName.Split().
     Select(Function(Name) New With {Name, fName})).
     OrderBy(Function(x) x.fName).
     ThenBy(Function(x) x.Name).
     Select(Function(x) x.Name & " came from " & x.fName)

This neat query is much more readable and maintainable in my opinion:

query = From fullName In fullNames
        From name In fullName.Split()
        Order By fullName, name
        Select name & " came from " & fullName

VB.NET's query syntax is also more powerful and less verbose than in C#: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6515130/284240

For example this LINQ to DataSet(Objects) query

VB.NET:

Dim first10Rows = From r In dataTable1 Take 10

C#:

var first10Rows = (from r in dataTable1.AsEnumerable() 
                   select r)
                   .Take(10);

Upvotes: 24

James Newton-King
James Newton-King

Reputation: 49042

Each style has their pros and cons. Query syntax is nicer when it comes to joins and it has the useful let keyword that makes creating temporary variables inside a query easy.

Fluent syntax on the other hand has a lot more methods and operations that aren't exposed through the query syntax. Also since they are just extension methods you can write your own.

I have found that every time I start writing a LINQ statement using the query syntax I end up having to put it in parenthesis and fall back to using fluent LINQ extension methods. Query syntax just doesn't have enough features to use by itself.

Upvotes: 29

Rodi
Rodi

Reputation: 398

I have just set up our company's standards and we enforce the use of the Extension methods. I think it's a good idea to choose one over the other and don't mix them up in code. Extension methods read more like the other code.

The comprehension syntax does not have all operators and using parentheses around the query and add extension methods after all just begs me for using extension methods from the start.

But for the most part it is just personal preference with a few exceptions.

Upvotes: 3

Jay Bazuzi
Jay Bazuzi

Reputation: 46506

I prefer to use the latter (sometimes called "query comprehension syntax") when I can write the whole expression that way. 

var titlesQuery = from e in entries
                  where e.Approved
                  orderby e.Rating
                  select e.Titles;

var title = titlesQuery.FirstOrDefault();

As soon as I have to add (parentheses) and .MethodCalls(), I change.

When I use the former, I usually put one clause per line, like this:

var title = entries
    .Where (e => e.Approved)
    .OrderBy (e => e.Rating)
    .Select (e => e.Title)
    .FirstOrDefault();

I find that a little easier to read.

Upvotes: 60

Larsenal
Larsenal

Reputation: 51156

I know this question is tagged with C#, but the Fluent syntax is painfully verbose with VB.NET.

Upvotes: 5

Joe Albahari
Joe Albahari

Reputation: 30934

Neither is better: they serve different needs. Query syntax comes into its own when you want to leverage multiple range variables. This happens in three situations:

  • When using the let keyword
  • When you have multiple generators (from clauses)
  • When doing joins

Here's an example (from the LINQPad samples):

string[] fullNames = { "Anne Williams", "John Fred Smith", "Sue Green" };

var query =
  from fullName in fullNames
  from name in fullName.Split()
  orderby fullName, name
  select name + " came from " + fullName;

Now compare this to the same thing in method syntax:

var query = fullNames
  .SelectMany (fName => fName.Split().Select (name => new { name, fName } ))
  .OrderBy (x => x.fName)
  .ThenBy  (x => x.name)
  .Select  (x => x.name + " came from " + x.fName);

Method syntax, on the other hand, exposes the full gamut of query operators and is more concise with simple queries. You can get the best of both worlds by mixing query and method syntax. This is often done in LINQ to SQL queries:

var query =
  from c in db.Customers
  let totalSpend = c.Purchases.Sum (p => p.Price)    // Method syntax here
  where totalSpend > 1000
  from p in c.Purchases
  select new { p.Description, totalSpend, c.Address.State };

Upvotes: 272

Instance Hunter
Instance Hunter

Reputation: 7925

I don't get the query syntax at all. There's just no reason for it in my mind. let can be acheived with .Select and anonymous types. I just think things look much more organized with the "punctuation" in there.

Upvotes: 18

Steve T
Steve T

Reputation: 7838

I prefer the query syntax as I came from traditional web programming using SQL. It is much easier for me to wrap my head around. However, it think I will start to utilize the .Where(lambda) as it is definitely much shorter.

Upvotes: 4

LizB
LizB

Reputation: 2213

While I do understand and like the fluent format , I've stuck to Query for the time being for readability reasons. People just being introduced to LINQ will find Query much more comfortable to read.

Upvotes: 4

Christian C. Salvadó
Christian C. Salvadó

Reputation: 827366

I really like the Fluent syntax and I try to use it where I can, but in certain cases, for example where I use joins, I usually prefer the Query syntax, in those cases I find it easier to read, and I think some people are more familiar to Query (SQL-like) syntax, than lambdas.

Upvotes: 4

James Curran
James Curran

Reputation: 103505

The fluent interface if there's just a where. If I need a select or orderby, I generally use the Query syntax.

Upvotes: 13

Kozyarchuk
Kozyarchuk

Reputation: 21837

Fluent syntax does seem more powerful indeed, it should also work better for organizing code into small reusable methods.

Upvotes: 9

Related Questions